受贿罪立法完善问题研究
[Abstract]:Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the crime of accepting bribes has gone through a process of transformation from scratch to meticulous, from being attached to the crime of corruption to separation. 52 (regulations) subordinate the act of bribery to the crime of corruption. To become one of the manifestations of corruption crime; 79 the Criminal Law has made the crime of accepting bribes independently, and the constitution conditions of "making use of the convenience of duty" have been made clear, 97 the criminal law has preliminarily constructed the charge of the crime of accepting bribes, but there is no independent system of punishment and punishment, and the legislative example of "according to punishment" is adopted. The amendment of the Criminal Law (9) details the conditions for the establishment of the crime of accepting bribes and the standard of punishment, and comparatively improves the link of conviction and sentencing and the system of leniency. At present, under the guidance of the criminal policy of "combining leniency and severity with punishment", the legislation of the crime of accepting bribes has such a severe side as to add "life imprisonment system" and "fine penalty", and at the same time, it also has the stipulation of "lenient punishment" to reflect the lenient side. After this revision, the crime of accepting bribes has established the standard of "dualistic" conviction and sentencing of "relative fixed amount circumstances", which is more appropriate to measure the nature of the crime of accepting bribes. In the process of cognizance and discretion of bribery, more attention is paid to the consideration of circumstances, so that flexible legislation can give judges more discretion and realize case justice. At the same time, the statutory punishment for the crime of accepting bribes has made a major readjustment. The remarkable feature is that the range of sentences for free punishment is lengthened to take care of the "dual" standard of conviction and sentencing. After the amendment of the Criminal Law (9), the legislation on the crime of accepting bribes has been improved. To sum up, there are three parts: "realizing the rigour of criminal law net", "enhancing the flexibility of conviction and sentencing" and "embodying the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity". However, there are still some unresolved problems in the academic circle, such as the crime of accepting bribes is still applicable to "according to punishment", that is, the criminal punishment should be in accordance with the crime of corruption, and for example, the allocation of statutory punishment lacks the "qualification penalty" which has "immediate effect" and so on. In view of the characteristics of the times evolution and the legislative defects of the crime of accepting bribes, it is necessary to perfect the legislation, mainly to expand the scope of "bribery" to "property interests" and to cancel the elements of "seeking benefits for others" in the content of the crime. In the arrangement of statutory punishment, the statutory punishment of bribery crime should be independent, the death penalty of bribery crime should be abolished, and the life imprisonment system of bribery crime should be abolished. In addition, the system of lenient punishment should be improved. Articles 385 and 388 of the Criminal Law provide for four forms of bribery, namely, "soliciting bribery", "accepting bribery of a type", "taking a commercial bribe" and "taking bribes through mediation." The law is too broad to deal with many new forms of bribery, so it is necessary to draw on foreign legislative models. The dilemma in the administration of justice is limited to the defects of the legislation. Although the Criminal Law Amendment (9) has made a huge repair to the crime of accepting bribes, but the "criticism" that has been deposited for many years has not been resolved, the next improvement direction is mainly from the above several aspects. Step by step.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.392
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 莫晓宇;我国刑法中设立职业(技能)资格刑初探[J];广西社会科学;2004年04期
2 吴平;《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》中的资格刑规定述评[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2004年02期
3 李丽君;资格刑比较研究[J];洛阳大学学报;2005年03期
4 宋楠;;我国资格刑研究及立法建议[J];成都大学学报(社会科学版);2007年05期
5 陶娟;江华;;完善我国资格刑制度的思考[J];湘潮(下半月)(理论);2008年03期
6 高长富;;资格刑改良论——以适用于我国公民犯罪的资格刑为视角[J];社会科学论坛(学术研究卷);2008年06期
7 张珊珊;;论我国资格刑立法设置的完善[J];才智;2009年06期
8 曾粤兴;何静;;法人资格刑制度研究[J];法治研究;2012年07期
9 谢洁茹;胡思华;;论资格刑及其完善[J];江西广播电视大学学报;2012年03期
10 唐海英;;我国资格刑存在的困境及完善探究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年07期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈智清;资格刑适用与推进反腐败斗争[N];湖北日报;2003年
2 张达伟;增设资格刑有利于制止犯罪[N];江苏经济报;2004年
3 赵秉志 黄荣康;资格刑在惩治经济犯罪中的充分适用[N];人民法院报;2004年
4 王恩海 华东政法大学副教授 硕士研究生导师;从“禁驾”看刑法资格刑的完善[N];上海法治报;2014年
5 钱雯;建议设立职务犯罪资格刑[N];人民政协报;2007年
6 梁统;经济犯罪应增设资格刑[N];检察日报;2003年
7 戴杜平;对贪污贿赂犯罪应增设资格刑[N];江苏法制报;2007年
8 何德飞;职务犯罪应增设资格刑[N];法制日报;2004年
9 华东政法学院 熊理思;建议在知识产权犯罪中增设资格刑[N];人民法院报;2006年
10 北京市海淀区人民检察院反贪局副局长、法学博士 罗猛;对贪贿犯罪要注重适用资格刑财产刑[N];检察日报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张珊珊;资格刑设置研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张静波;资格刑研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
2 龙力;对我国资格刑的反思与重构[D];西南政法大学;2009年
3 韩胜超;我国资格刑的反思与重构[D];河南大学;2010年
4 杨小强;对我国资格刑的分析与思考[D];华东政法大学;2010年
5 李琳;资格刑研究[D];中国青年政治学院;2011年
6 蒋芳;我国资格刑现状评析及完善[D];西南大学;2011年
7 任绪保;资格刑研究[D];四川大学;2006年
8 丛延松;资格刑的比较研究[D];山东大学;2006年
9 委安照;资格刑论[D];中国政法大学;2002年
10 徐会霞;对我国资格刑的反思与完善[D];西南政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2399260
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2399260.html