关于刑事管辖权冲突及其解决模式的思考——全球化时代中国刑事管辖权的应然立场

发布时间：2019-01-09 09:13

【摘要】：在全球化的背景下,中国与外国的刑事管辖权冲突日益频繁,这凸显了中国刑事管辖权制度的时代性滞后以及重塑的现实需求。根据中外管辖权冲突的具体组合类型,在坚持属地管辖原则的排他性管辖效力的基础上,应当积极构建刑事诉讼移管等制度,完善中国普遍管辖权的配套规则,以夯实中国刑法域外适用的法理依据。全球化背景下中国刑事管辖权应积极适应中国利益全球布局的时代特点,以中国利益维护为导向,充分做好制度与理论的双重准备,在国际法和国内法两个层面重塑中国刑事管辖权,构建符合中国利益的全球性、区域性和双边性的国际司法合作机制。既要强化国际协同与协作,更应该强调中国司法主权优先的理念,积极争取司法管辖权,并避免具体案件管辖上的惰性思想。
[Abstract]:Under the background of globalization, the conflicts of criminal jurisdiction between China and foreign countries are becoming more and more frequent, which highlights the lag of the Chinese criminal jurisdiction system in the times and the realistic demand of remoulding. According to the specific combination types of Chinese and foreign jurisdiction conflicts, on the basis of the exclusive jurisdiction effect of the principle of territorial jurisdiction, we should actively construct the system of transfer and management of criminal proceedings, and perfect the matching rules of China's universal jurisdiction. In order to consolidate the legal basis for the extraterritorial application of Chinese criminal law. Under the background of globalization, China's criminal jurisdiction should actively adapt to the characteristics of the global distribution of China's interests, be guided by the maintenance of China's interests, and make full preparations for both the system and the theory. To rebuild China's criminal jurisdiction at the two levels of international law and domestic law, and to construct a global, regional and bilateral international judicial cooperation mechanism that conforms to China's interests. It is not only necessary to strengthen international cooperation and cooperation, but also to emphasize the idea of priority of China's judicial sovereignty, to actively strive for judicial jurisdiction, and to avoid the inert idea of jurisdiction in specific cases.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学司法文明协同创新中心;中国人民公安大学法学院;
【基金】：中宣部文化名家暨四个一批人才项目“城市、国家的国际化与法律准备”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】