刑法解释中文本、法益与罪刑法定原则的博弈——兼论“解释熵值”在受贿罪中的应用

发布时间：2019-01-20 20:13

【摘要】：刑法解释难题的焦点在于文义、法益与罪刑法定原则三者的博弈:如何确定解释的合法性,并在文义与法益之间求得最佳结果?对应这两个核心问题,本文提出了"理论底线"与"应用底线"的概念,并认为正统分类中文义解释与目的论解释的对立,以及形式解释与实质解释之对立,均偏离了问题焦点。尤其是后者将逻辑上本不互斥的形式解释与实质解释对立起来,实则混淆了"取值范围"问题与"得数"问题。.在此基础上,本文提倡"内源"解释与"外源"解释的对立,并在深入分析解释方法的"位阶""权重"概念僵局后,提出了"解释熵值"的概念及模式。最后,本文使用"解释熵值"对受贿罪若干疑难问题进行了新的解读。
[Abstract]:The focus of the difficult problem of criminal law interpretation lies in the game of text meaning, legal interest and principle of legality of crime: how to determine the legality of interpretation and obtain the best result between text meaning and legal interest? Corresponding to these two core problems, this paper puts forward the concepts of "theoretical bottom line" and "applied bottom line", and holds that the literary meaning interpretation and teleological interpretation in orthodox classification are opposite, and the formal interpretation and substantive interpretation are opposite. All deviated from the focus of the problem. In particular, the latter contradicts the logically non-mutually exclusive formal interpretation with the substantive interpretation, which actually confuses the "value range" problem with the "number" problem. On this basis, this paper advocates the opposition between "endogenous" interpretation and "exogenous" interpretation, and puts forward the concept and model of "interpretation entropy value" after deeply analyzing the deadlock of the concept of "rank" and "weight" of interpretation method. Finally, this paper uses the explanation entropy value to interpret some difficult problems of bribery crime.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目《功能视域下的法益概念及其自由本质研究》(批准号:15FFX026)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】