论自杀的参与行为
发布时间：2019-02-15 13:28
【摘要】：在我国，自杀行为不是犯罪。出于对个人自己决定权的尊重，站在法益侵害说的立场，法律应当承认自杀行为的合法性。在我国，教唆、帮助自杀等自杀参与行为同样不是犯罪，但学界和司法实践中往往将自杀参与行为评价为故意杀人行为。应当将自杀参与行为与故意杀人罪的实行行进行严格的区分，并且，根据我国目前学界普遍接受和承认的共犯从属性理论，刑法也暂时无法对其进行合理地规制。考虑到生命的处置权应当只属于个人，应当排斥他人的介入，且该行为是对社会秩序的严重破坏，站在刑法家长主义的立场上，，刑法应当处罚自杀参与行为。唯一能解决此矛盾的方法是将自杀参与行为单独定罪，以保障处罚上的正当性、合理性以及量刑的精准性。
[Abstract]:Suicide is not a crime in our country. The law should recognize the legality of suicide because of the respect for the individual's right to decide and stand on the standpoint of the doctrine of legal interest infringement. In our country, it is not a crime to commit suicide, such as abetting, aiding suicide and so on. However, in academic and judicial practice, suicide participation is often regarded as intentional homicide. It is necessary to make a strict distinction between the behavior of suicidal participation and the practice of intentional homicide, and, according to the theory of accomplice, which is generally accepted and recognized by scholars in our country at present, the criminal law is unable to regulate it reasonably for the time being. Taking into account that the right to dispose of life should belong to individuals and exclude the intervention of others, and the behavior is a serious breach of social order, the criminal law should punish the act of suicide participation from the standpoint of paternalism of criminal law. The only way to solve this contradiction is to convict the behavior of suicide participation separately, so as to ensure the legitimacy, rationality and precision of punishment.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
本文编号：2423406
[Abstract]:Suicide is not a crime in our country. The law should recognize the legality of suicide because of the respect for the individual's right to decide and stand on the standpoint of the doctrine of legal interest infringement. In our country, it is not a crime to commit suicide, such as abetting, aiding suicide and so on. However, in academic and judicial practice, suicide participation is often regarded as intentional homicide. It is necessary to make a strict distinction between the behavior of suicidal participation and the practice of intentional homicide, and, according to the theory of accomplice, which is generally accepted and recognized by scholars in our country at present, the criminal law is unable to regulate it reasonably for the time being. Taking into account that the right to dispose of life should belong to individuals and exclude the intervention of others, and the behavior is a serious breach of social order, the criminal law should punish the act of suicide participation from the standpoint of paternalism of criminal law. The only way to solve this contradiction is to convict the behavior of suicide participation separately, so as to ensure the legitimacy, rationality and precision of punishment.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯军;刑法的规范化诠释[J];法商研究;2005年06期
2 王志远;;论我国共犯制度存在的逻辑矛盾——以教唆、帮助自杀的实践处理方案为切入点[J];法学评论;2011年05期
3 王昭武;;论共犯的最小从属性说——日本共犯从属性理论的发展与借鉴[J];法学;2007年11期
4 钱叶六;;共犯的实行从属性说之提倡[J];法学;2012年11期
5 胡泽卿;自杀的概念及分类[J];华西医学;1995年01期
6 陈洪兵;;最小从属性说与极端从属性说批判——兼质疑王昭武先生倡导的最小从属性说[J];南京农业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
7 王钢;;自杀的认定及其相关行为的刑法评价[J];法学研究;2012年04期
8 赵秉志;相约自杀案件的刑事责任——兼析李某见死不救行为的定性处理[J];人民公安;1997年21期
9 王钢;;自杀行为违法性之否定——与钱叶六博士商榷[J];清华法学;2013年03期
10 冯军;;刑法中的自我答责[J];中国法学;2006年03期
本文编号：2423406
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2423406.html
