犯罪故意认识对象中规范评价要素的辨析
发布时间：2019-03-16 13:47
【摘要】：犯罪故意的认识对象是犯罪主观方面中一个具有客观属性的范围,包括"行为"、"会"、"危害社会的结果"。其中"会"、"危害社会的结果"属于规范性要素。规范性的价值判断必须以一定的客观依据为标准才能形成普适性准则。因此,在对"会"即危害结果发生概率的判断标准上,应当采取盖然性说和一般人标准;对"危害社会的结果"即行为当时对行为或后果的程度判断上,应当采取抽象的法益侵犯说。且由于违法性认识在现有的刑法体系中具有独特的地位和作用,并不等同于社会危害性,故不能将违法性认识认定为犯罪故意的认识对象。
[Abstract]:The cognition object of criminal intention is a scope with objective attribute in subjective aspect of crime, including "behavior", "meeting" and "the result of endangering society". Among them "the meeting", "the result that endangers the society" belongs to the normative element. Normative value judgment must be based on a certain objective basis to form a universal criterion. Therefore, in the judgment standard of "meeting", that is, the occurrence probability of the harm result, we should adopt the cover probability theory and the general person standard; Abstract legal interest infringement should be adopted to judge the extent to which the act or consequence is the result of endangering society at that time. And because the illegality cognition has a unique position and function in the existing criminal law system, it is not equal to the harm of the society, so the illegality cognition cannot be regarded as the cognition object of the criminal intention.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
，
本文编号：2441492
[Abstract]:The cognition object of criminal intention is a scope with objective attribute in subjective aspect of crime, including "behavior", "meeting" and "the result of endangering society". Among them "the meeting", "the result that endangers the society" belongs to the normative element. Normative value judgment must be based on a certain objective basis to form a universal criterion. Therefore, in the judgment standard of "meeting", that is, the occurrence probability of the harm result, we should adopt the cover probability theory and the general person standard; Abstract legal interest infringement should be adopted to judge the extent to which the act or consequence is the result of endangering society at that time. And because the illegality cognition has a unique position and function in the existing criminal law system, it is not equal to the harm of the society, so the illegality cognition cannot be regarded as the cognition object of the criminal intention.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
，
本文编号：2441492
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2441492.html
