诱骗他人购买赝品“古玩”该如何定性
发布时间：2019-03-16 22:37
【摘要】：正案情简介于某、于某某和罗某经常在一起玩弄古玩,并时常在三人之间进行交换。2012年5月,于某以人民币350元的价格从临时地摊上购得一把紫砂橘红釉提梁壶。于某某在于某家看到该壶后,得知该壶的来源,并看出该壶确属赝品,两人合谋将该壶进行高价出售,并约定获利后两人分享。罗某得知于某有该紫砂橘红釉提梁壶后,欲向其购买。期间,于某某在自己家中打开相关网页,将与该壶类似的真品紫砂提梁壶的高价拍卖案例给罗某看,使罗某误以为
[Abstract]:Case brief Yu, Yu and Luo often play with the antiques, and often exchange between the three. In May 2012, Yu bought a purple sand orange-red glaze barnacle from the temporary ground stand at a price of 350 yuan. After so-and-so saw the pot, learned its origin and saw that it was a fake, the two men conspired to sell the pot at a high price and agreed to share the pot after they agreed to make a profit. Luo learned that there was a purple sand orange-red glaze after the jug, want to buy from it. During the period, so-and-so in his own home to open the relevant web page, similar to the pot similar to the high-priced purple sand ladle auction case to Luo to see, so that Luo mistakenly thought
【作者单位】： 江苏省南通市通州区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D924.35
，
本文编号：2442021
[Abstract]:Case brief Yu, Yu and Luo often play with the antiques, and often exchange between the three. In May 2012, Yu bought a purple sand orange-red glaze barnacle from the temporary ground stand at a price of 350 yuan. After so-and-so saw the pot, learned its origin and saw that it was a fake, the two men conspired to sell the pot at a high price and agreed to share the pot after they agreed to make a profit. Luo learned that there was a purple sand orange-red glaze after the jug, want to buy from it. During the period, so-and-so in his own home to open the relevant web page, similar to the pot similar to the high-priced purple sand ladle auction case to Luo to see, so that Luo mistakenly thought
【作者单位】： 江苏省南通市通州区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D924.35
，
本文编号：2442021
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2442021.html
