刑法中的因果关系探析
发布时间：2019-04-01 12:44
【摘要】：因果关系是指原因与结果之间引起与被引起的联系,在刑法中确定因果关系的意义就在于将危害结果归责于行为人所实施的危害行为。因果关系理论是刑法学中的一个重要基础理论问题,也是在实践中所面临的最为困难的问题之一。若要使之从徘徊中走出来,就要准确把握住刑法因果关系的实质在于归责,而不是归因问题。在这个问题上,客观归责理论作为一个具有明确标准的归责理论体系,可以在一定程度上有效解决实践中所面临的因果关系难题。 本文从以下几个部分对因果关系理论进行分析探讨,比对国内外对这一问题的理论发展,从中找出解决因果关系问题的方法思路。 第一部分：对我国传统因果关系理论的形成与发展进行总结和反思,从中反映出传统因果关系理论从形成初期提出具有自己特色的理论深度到逐渐陷入哲学理论概念束缚的过程。 第二部分：对我国传统因果关系理论进行阐述分析,特别是对“必然——偶然”因果关系的争论进行探讨,得出对传统因果关系理论必须找到新的研究路径才能进一步使之发展完善的观点。 第三部分：对国外刑法因果关系理论进行评价分析,从中找出不同于我国因果关系理论的能够有效解决因果关系问题的研究方法。即从对因果关系的事实层面研究转向对因果关系的实质法律层面研究,从归因问题向归责问题转变。 第四部分：由于刑法因果关系的本质在于归责,因此,对刑事责任与因果关系的联系、责任的本质问题进行研究分析。 第五部分：对解决因果关系问题具有指导意义的客观归责理论进行分析探讨,包括客观归责的理论原理、基本构造、判断模式、体系地位等问题。
[Abstract]:Causation refers to the relationship between cause and result, and the significance of determining causation in criminal law lies in imputing the harm result to the harm behavior carried out by the actor. Causality theory is not only an important basic theory problem in criminal law, but also one of the most difficult problems in practice. If we want to make it out of the wander, we must grasp the essence of causality in criminal law, not attribution. On this issue, objective imputation theory, as a system of imputation theory with clear criteria, can solve the problem of causality in practice to a certain extent. This paper analyzes and discusses the theory of causality from the following parts, compares the theoretical development of this problem at home and abroad, and finds out the methods to solve the problem of causation. The first part is a summary and reflection on the formation and development of the traditional causality theory in China. It reflects the process of the traditional causality theory from the theoretical depth with its own characteristics in the early stage of formation to gradually fall into the bondage of the philosophical theory concept. The second part: expounding and analyzing the traditional causation theory of our country, especially discussing the argument of "necessity-chance" causality. It is concluded that the traditional causal relationship theory must find a new research path in order to further improve its development. The third part evaluates and analyzes the theory of causation in foreign criminal law, and finds out the research methods which can effectively solve the problem of causation, which are different from the theory of causality in our country. That is, from the de facto study of causal relationship to the substantive legal level of causal relationship, and from attribution to imputation. The fourth part: because the nature of causation in criminal law is imputation, therefore, the relationship between criminal responsibility and causation, and the essence of liability are studied and analyzed. The fifth part analyzes and discusses the theory of objective imputation which is instructive to solve the problem of causation, including the theoretical principle of objective imputation, the basic structure, the mode of judgment, the status of the system and so on.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D914
本文编号：2451566
[Abstract]:Causation refers to the relationship between cause and result, and the significance of determining causation in criminal law lies in imputing the harm result to the harm behavior carried out by the actor. Causality theory is not only an important basic theory problem in criminal law, but also one of the most difficult problems in practice. If we want to make it out of the wander, we must grasp the essence of causality in criminal law, not attribution. On this issue, objective imputation theory, as a system of imputation theory with clear criteria, can solve the problem of causality in practice to a certain extent. This paper analyzes and discusses the theory of causality from the following parts, compares the theoretical development of this problem at home and abroad, and finds out the methods to solve the problem of causation. The first part is a summary and reflection on the formation and development of the traditional causality theory in China. It reflects the process of the traditional causality theory from the theoretical depth with its own characteristics in the early stage of formation to gradually fall into the bondage of the philosophical theory concept. The second part: expounding and analyzing the traditional causation theory of our country, especially discussing the argument of "necessity-chance" causality. It is concluded that the traditional causal relationship theory must find a new research path in order to further improve its development. The third part evaluates and analyzes the theory of causation in foreign criminal law, and finds out the research methods which can effectively solve the problem of causation, which are different from the theory of causality in our country. That is, from the de facto study of causal relationship to the substantive legal level of causal relationship, and from attribution to imputation. The fourth part: because the nature of causation in criminal law is imputation, therefore, the relationship between criminal responsibility and causation, and the essence of liability are studied and analyzed. The fifth part analyzes and discusses the theory of objective imputation which is instructive to solve the problem of causation, including the theoretical principle of objective imputation, the basic structure, the mode of judgment, the status of the system and so on.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D914
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 夏勇;;邓玉娇案件与罗克辛的客观归责理论[J];北方法学;2009年05期
2 姜敏;;客观归责的理论实质论析——以因果关系为切入点[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
3 姜敏;;“客观归责”在中国犯罪论体系中的地位研究——以因果关系为切入点[J];法学杂志;2010年06期
4 陈兴良;;刑法因果关系:从哲学回归刑法学——一个学说史的考察[J];法学;2009年07期
5 周光权;刑法中的因果关系和客观归责论[J];江海学刊;2005年03期
6 陈兴良;;客观归责的体系性地位[J];法学研究;2009年06期
7 曲新久;;试论刑法学的基本范畴[J];法学研究;1991年01期
8 周光权;犯罪构成理论与价值评价的关系[J];环球法律评论;2003年03期
9 张晓明;;刑法中的偶然因果关系论不科学[J];现代法学;1983年02期
10 陈兴良;刑法因果关系研究[J];现代法学;1999年05期
，本文编号：2451566
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2451566.html
