我国刑罚裁量过程中立功认定问题研究
发布时间：2019-04-11 19:00
【摘要】：在我国,按照刑事程序进程的推进,将立功分为刑罚裁量过程中的立功与刑罚执行过程中的立功,或者作为量刑情节的立功和作为行刑情节的立功;也有人以立功对象的不同,将其称之为犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的立功与罪犯的立功。本文将论述对象限定在刑罚裁量过程中的立功,也即犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的立功。立功源于“立功受奖”的思想,因其给社会带来的实际效用而被青睐。本文以量刑情节的立功这一“微型”视角为研究对象,集中深入地讨论了立功的内涵、历史变迁和价值根基,试图对立功认定中出现得比较频繁的部分疑难问题进行梳理,并寻找问题的解决路径。本文除了引言外,共分为五个部分,约3万字:第一部分是立功的概述。此部分首先界定了立功的概念,分析立功定义中所包含的要素;接着以时间为线索,梳理了我国立功的历史渊源,并理清了我国立功作为法定量刑情节的价值取向。第二部分是对立功的价值根基展开的论述。先后阐述了立功的正义价值以及功利价值的内涵及其体现,并引出立功适用中两大价值冲突及其平衡;最终确立立功中“正义优先、兼顾功利”的价值定位,为解决司法认定中的难题提供理论依据。第三部分主要梳理立功认定中出现的部分问题。以案例为蓝本,提取了各个类型立功中的部分争议点。指出立功适用中标准模糊、揭发对象对立功认定的影响、线索来源不明以及立功行为异化等现实中比较常见的问题。第四部分为解决立功认定问题的具体途径。这是本文的重点。这一部分对第三部分所提出的问题进行了一一解答,提出要对立功认定标准进行细化;对立功的主体、“其他”条款进行了解释;回答了涉及揭发对象不同从而影响立功认定的问题;还指出了立功线索要具有明确性与正当性,并对立功异化现象中的几个特殊问题的认定提出了自己的看法。第五部分为结语。这一部分补充说明了立功在立法方面存在的问题,提出了立法上对立功进行完善的建议,并对本文的写作目的、内容及意义进行了重申。
[Abstract]:In our country, according to the progress of the criminal procedure, the meritorious service is divided into the meritorious service in the course of the penalty discretion and the merit in the process of the execution of the penalty, or as the merit of the circumstances of the sentencing and the circumstances of the execution of the sentence; Some people call it the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service and the criminal's meritorious service according to the different objects of meritorious service. This article limits the object to the meritorious service in the process of penalty discretion, that is, the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service. Meritorious service originates from the idea of meritorious service and is favored for its practical utility to the society. This paper focuses on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service, and tries to sort out some difficult problems that appear frequently in the determination of meritorious service, based on the "mini" angle of view of "merit in sentencing circumstances", focusing on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service. And find a solution to the problem. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts, about 30,000 words: the first part is a summary of meritorious service. This part first defines the concept of meritorious service, analyzes the elements contained in the definition of meritorious service, and then combs the historical origin of our country's meritorious service with the clue of time, and clarifies the value orientation of our country's meritorious service as the circumstances of statutory sentencing. The second part is the discussion of the value foundation of meritorious service. It expounds the connotation and embodiment of the justice value and utility value of meritorious service, and leads to the conflict and balance between the two values in the application of meritorious service. Finally, the value orientation of "justice first, giving consideration to utility" in meritorious service is established, which provides the theoretical basis for solving the difficult problems in judicial determination. The third part mainly combs some problems that appear in the recognition of meritorious service. Based on the case, this paper extracts some controversial points of each type of meritorious service. It is pointed out that there are some common problems in the application of meritorious service, such as the vague standard, the influence of exposed objects on the recognition of meritorious service, the unknown source of clues and the alienation of meritorious behavior and so on. The fourth part is the concrete way to solve the problem of merit determination. This is the focus of this article. This part answers one by one the questions raised in the third part, proposes to refine the standards of merit recognition, explains the main body of meritorious service, "other" clauses, and makes a detailed explanation of the "other" clauses of the main body of meritorious service. It also points out that the clue of meritorious service should have clarity and legitimacy, and puts forward some opinions on the identification of some special problems in the phenomenon of dissimilation of meritorious service. The fifth part is the conclusion. In this part, the author explains the problems existing in the legislation of meritorious service, puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect it in legislation, and reiterates the purpose, content and significance of this article.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924
本文编号：2456667
[Abstract]:In our country, according to the progress of the criminal procedure, the meritorious service is divided into the meritorious service in the course of the penalty discretion and the merit in the process of the execution of the penalty, or as the merit of the circumstances of the sentencing and the circumstances of the execution of the sentence; Some people call it the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service and the criminal's meritorious service according to the different objects of meritorious service. This article limits the object to the meritorious service in the process of penalty discretion, that is, the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service. Meritorious service originates from the idea of meritorious service and is favored for its practical utility to the society. This paper focuses on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service, and tries to sort out some difficult problems that appear frequently in the determination of meritorious service, based on the "mini" angle of view of "merit in sentencing circumstances", focusing on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service. And find a solution to the problem. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts, about 30,000 words: the first part is a summary of meritorious service. This part first defines the concept of meritorious service, analyzes the elements contained in the definition of meritorious service, and then combs the historical origin of our country's meritorious service with the clue of time, and clarifies the value orientation of our country's meritorious service as the circumstances of statutory sentencing. The second part is the discussion of the value foundation of meritorious service. It expounds the connotation and embodiment of the justice value and utility value of meritorious service, and leads to the conflict and balance between the two values in the application of meritorious service. Finally, the value orientation of "justice first, giving consideration to utility" in meritorious service is established, which provides the theoretical basis for solving the difficult problems in judicial determination. The third part mainly combs some problems that appear in the recognition of meritorious service. Based on the case, this paper extracts some controversial points of each type of meritorious service. It is pointed out that there are some common problems in the application of meritorious service, such as the vague standard, the influence of exposed objects on the recognition of meritorious service, the unknown source of clues and the alienation of meritorious behavior and so on. The fourth part is the concrete way to solve the problem of merit determination. This is the focus of this article. This part answers one by one the questions raised in the third part, proposes to refine the standards of merit recognition, explains the main body of meritorious service, "other" clauses, and makes a detailed explanation of the "other" clauses of the main body of meritorious service. It also points out that the clue of meritorious service should have clarity and legitimacy, and puts forward some opinions on the identification of some special problems in the phenomenon of dissimilation of meritorious service. The fifth part is the conclusion. In this part, the author explains the problems existing in the legislation of meritorious service, puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect it in legislation, and reiterates the purpose, content and significance of this article.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 熊瑛;张凤彬;;关于我国刑法立功概念的综述及评析[J];四川理工学院学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
2 殷艳梅;;刑事侦查阶段立功制度实行现状探究[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2012年08期
3 徐科雷;;刑法立功制度若干问题刍议[J];中国刑事法杂志;2012年03期
4 熊瑛;;试论立功制度的五重根基[J];河北法学;2012年02期
5 陈欢;;我国立功制度再探讨[J];湖南警察学院学报;2011年06期
6 张影;谢文春;;立功制度若干问题研究[J];行政与法;2011年12期
7 陈瑞林;严西文;;反思我国刑法中的立功制度[J];韩山师范学院学报;2011年02期
8 徐艳;;立功认定若干问题探析[J];市场周刊(理论研究);2011年03期
9 蔡永彤;;功利与公正之间：立功制度的价值取向及其改造[J];政治与法律;2008年08期
10 甘杰丽;;从买功现象看立功制度的本质[J];广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年S2期
，本文编号：2456667
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2456667.html
