当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

故意泄露国家秘密罪的问题研究

发布时间:2019-04-23 21:52
【摘要】:近年来,故意泄露国家秘密的案件时有发生,给国家的安全和利益造成严重的损害,对社会生活秩序和国家机关正常工作秩序造成严重干扰和破坏。为了准确适用刑法打击此类犯罪,有必要对本罪在理论上和在司法实践中存在的问题进行分析研究。笔者将对故意泄露国家秘密罪中争议较大的几个问题进行探讨,提出自己的主张和观点。本文总共分为八个部分:一、问题的提出;二、本罪犯罪主体的讨论;三、关于本罪的对象“国家秘密”;四、对本罪客观行为的探讨;五、对本罪成立条件“情节严重”的理解;六、在故意和过失的情形下,法定刑是否应当一致?七、关于本罪的未遂犯;八、本罪的罪数问题探讨。第一部分为问题的提出。笔者首先通过案例的表述,提出关于本罪几个具有重要意义的问题,表明本文的研究方向和意义。第二部分是对本罪犯罪主体的讨论。本罪主体是一般主体还是特殊主体存在两种对立的争议,笔者在对两个观点分析评述的基础上提出自己的主张,明确犯罪主体的范围。同时,对本罪特殊主体范围的合理性以及单位能否成为本罪主体提出自己的观点。第三部分对本罪的对象“国家秘密”展开讨论。国家秘密的认定是区分罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的一个重要环节。笔者通过对国家秘密概念、特征、分类以及解密条件的探讨,充分解读国家秘密的知识要点,以便于对本罪的准确把握。第四部分对本罪客观行为方式的探讨。具体分析了国家秘密泄露的含义以及具体的泄露方法,对以不作为泄露国家秘密的情形做了阐述。第五部分是对本罪成立条件之一“情节严重”的理解。“情节严重”是本罪的必要构成要件,在司法解释中有较为系统的说明,笔者在对此进行评述的基础上提出了自己的主张,并对“情节严重”包括的行为提出自己的理解。第六部分对故意和过失法定刑是否应当一致进行探讨。首先对刑法中故意和过失处罚的基本原则进行评述,继而对故意和过失法定刑是否应当一致性的问题深入讨论,提出自己的观点。第七部分关于本罪的未遂犯探讨。本罪为纯正情节犯,对情节犯是否存在未遂的形态学者有不同的观点,笔者对两个观点分析评述并提出自己的见解,结合本罪的情况,对本罪未遂形态的构成条件进行分析并举例说明。第八部分对本罪的罪数形态进行探讨。
[Abstract]:In recent years, cases of deliberately disclosing state secrets have occurred from time to time, causing serious damage to the security and interests of the state, and seriously disturbing and destroying the social life order and the normal working order of state organs. In order to accurately apply the criminal law to combat such crimes, it is necessary to analyze and study the problems existing in this crime in theory and in judicial practice. The author will discuss several controversial issues in the crime of intentional disclosure of state secrets, and put forward his own ideas and points of view. This paper is divided into eight parts: first, the issue of the proposed; second, the subject of the crime discussion; third, about the object of this crime "state secret"; fourth, the objective behavior of this crime; (5) the understanding of the "serious circumstances" of the conditions for the establishment of this crime; and (6) whether the statutory punishment should be consistent under the circumstances of intent and negligence? Seven, on the crime of attempted crime; eighth, the crime of the number of issues. The first part is the presentation of the problem. First of all, the author puts forward some important questions about this crime through the presentation of the case, which shows the research direction and significance of this paper. The second part is the discussion on the subject of this crime. Whether the subject of this crime is a general subject or a special subject has two opposing disputes. On the basis of analyzing and commenting on the two viewpoints, the author puts forward his own opinion and clarifies the scope of the subject of crime. At the same time, the rationality of the scope of the special subject of this crime and whether the unit can become the subject of this crime put forward their own point of view. The third part discusses the object of this crime, "State Secret". The cognizance of state secret is an important link of distinguishing crime from non-crime. Through the discussion of the concept, characteristics, classification and decryption conditions of state secrets, the author fully interprets the key points of the knowledge of state secrets, so as to facilitate the accurate grasp of this crime. The fourth part discusses the objective behavior of this crime. This paper analyzes the meaning of the leakage of state secrets and the specific leakage methods, and expounds the situation of disclosing the state secrets by omission. The fifth part is the understanding of "serious circumstances", one of the conditions for the establishment of this crime. "serious circumstances" is the essential element of the crime, and there is a systematic explanation in the judicial interpretation. On the basis of comments on this, the author puts forward his own opinion, and puts forward his own understanding of the acts included in the "serious circumstances". The sixth part discusses whether the statutory punishment of intent and negligence should be consistent. This paper first reviews the basic principles of intentional and negligent punishment in criminal law, and then discusses the consistency of intentional and negligent statutory punishment, and puts forward its own point of view. The seventh part discusses the attempted crime of this crime. This crime is a pure crime of affection. The author has different views on the existence of attempted plot crime. The author analyzes and comments on the two viewpoints and puts forward his own opinion, combining with the situation of this crime. The constitution condition of the attempted form of this crime is analyzed and illustrated with an example. The eighth part discusses the number of crimes in this crime.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 李希慧;董文辉;;论泄露国家秘密犯罪的立法完善[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年06期

2 罗勇;;论渎职犯罪主体中的几个问题[J];四川警察学院学报;2008年05期

3 张永红;张万顺;;国家秘密刑法保护的完善[J];山东警察学院学报;2008年02期

4 龙文懋;;侵犯国家秘密犯罪中国家秘密的甄别问题研究[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期

5 王戈;;泄露国家秘密罪构成解析[J];国家检察官学院学报;2007年02期

6 张杰;;论非法获取国家秘密罪[J];广州市公安管理干部学院学报;2006年01期

7 杨凯;泄露国家秘密犯罪刑事司法问题检讨[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2005年03期

8 李希慧,贾济东,廖焱清;渎职罪主体解释回顾及立法建言[J];国家检察官学院学报;2003年04期

9 程宗璋;试论国家机关工作人员[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2000年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 罗希;泄露国家秘密犯罪研究[D];湖南大学;2009年



本文编号:2463828

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2463828.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0ed75***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com