共同犯罪刑事责任的扩散——从解释论到方法论的重新演绎

发布时间：2019-04-25 08:28

【摘要】：共同犯罪刑事责任的扩散蕴含主观主义的危险信号,借助于模糊共犯、正犯行为界限的方式扩张刑事责任的范围,破坏共同犯罪模型的稳定性。共犯独立性、共犯正犯化等扩散共同犯罪刑事责任的现象皆为实质入罪思想的体现,其目的在于满足实践中量刑或者处罚扩张的需求,在解释论上向主观主义靠拢。共同犯罪刑事责任的扩散强调价值评价的独立性,看似符合规范论,实际上却从"出罪评价"走向"入罪评价",是为方法论的滥用。基于罪刑法定主义以及刑法体系之演变趋势,在解释论上,共同犯罪刑事责任的认定应当坚持实质客观的正犯性评价标准与从属性原则,在方法论上,应当融合存在论与规范论,从而为共同犯罪模型的稳固与具体犯罪的合理认定提供有力支撑。
[Abstract]:The diffusion of criminal responsibility of joint crime contains the danger signal of subjectivism. With the help of fuzzy accomplice and behavior limit of principal crime, the scope of criminal responsibility is expanded, and the stability of the joint crime model is destroyed. The phenomenon of joint criminal responsibility such as the independence of accomplice and the criminalization of accomplice is the embodiment of the thought of substantive criminalization, the purpose of which is to meet the demand of sentencing or the expansion of punishment in practice, and to approach subjectivism in the interpretation theory. The diffusion of criminal responsibility of joint crime emphasizes the independence of value evaluation, which seems to accord with the norm theory, but in fact, from "crime evaluation" to "conviction evaluation", it is an abuse of methodology. Based on the legal doctrine of criminal punishment and the evolution trend of criminal law system, on the theory of interpretation, the determination of criminal responsibility for joint crime should adhere to the evaluation criteria of substantive and objective offense and the principle of concurrence, in methodology. It is necessary to combine existential theory and normative theory so as to provide strong support for the stability of the joint crime model and the reasonable identification of specific crimes.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑法出罪机制问题研究”(15YJA820015)
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】