区分制理论解释共同过失犯罪之弊端及应然选择

发布时间：2019-05-11 03:27

【摘要】：二人以上共同过失犯罪能否成立共同正犯,是中外刑法理论界颇有争议的问题。过失的共同正犯肯定说与否定说是区分正犯与共犯的区分制体系的产物;肯定说不仅难以自圆其说,而且与区分制的体系相冲突,会动摇区分制的根基;否定说视共同过失犯罪为同时犯,不仅与同时犯和单独犯的理论不符,而且存在无视犯罪的共同性的明显缺陷。我国刑法采取单一正犯体系,不能用德、日的过失共同正犯肯定说或否定说来解释我国刑法中的共同过失犯罪。按单一正犯的解释论,不仅能克服过失共同正犯肯定说与否定说的弊病,而且能更好地适应司法实践的需要,更合理地处理共同过失犯罪案件。对我国有关司法解释中"以交通肇事罪的共犯论处"的规定,按单一正犯理论不难做出合理的说明。
[Abstract]:The establishment of joint principal of joint negligence between two or more persons is a controversial issue in the criminal law theory at home and abroad. The theory of affirmation and negation of the joint principal offender of negligence is the product of the system of distinguishing between the principal offender and the accomplice, and it is affirmed that it is not only difficult to justify itself, but also conflicts with the system of the division system, which will shake the foundation of the division system. The negative view of joint negligence crime as simultaneous crime is not only inconsistent with the theory of simultaneous crime and individual crime, but also has obvious defects in ignoring the commonality of crime. The criminal law of our country adopts a single principal offender system, which can not be explained by the affirmation or negation of the joint principal offender of morality and Japanese negligence. According to the theory of interpretation of a single principal offender, it can not only overcome the disadvantages of positive theory and negation theory of joint principal offender, but also better adapt to the needs of judicial practice and deal with the case of joint negligence crime more reasonably. According to the theory of single principal offender, it is not difficult to make a reasonable explanation of the stipulation of "accomplice in traffic accident crime" in the judicial interpretation of our country.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心;
【基金】：作者主持的教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“犯罪参与基本问题研究”(项目批准号:16JJD820018)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】