食品安全犯罪案例研究
发布时间：2019-05-30 08:31
【摘要】：食品是人类赖以生存和发展的首要物质资料，食品安全关系国计民生，食品安全出现问题，不仅损害人体的健康安全，还会损害经济社会发展的稳定性。2009年6月1日《食品安全法》公布实施，对危害食品安全犯罪的刑法规制提出了新要求。我国现行《刑法》对市场中的生产、经营者的行为和食品安全的监管主体的行为两方面进行调整，但是，就目前而言，这两方面在犯罪分类、罪名、与《食品安全法》存在矛盾、在实践中的操作性等方面都存在着不足之处。本文通过湖南益阳黑猪油事件与三鹿奶粉事件作为文章的主线，对当前主要涉及的关于食品安全犯罪的主要罪名，如生产、销售有毒有害食品罪、生产、销售不符合食品安全标准罪、非法经营罪等进行剖析，对食品安全刑法规制进行反思，力求重新审视现行的食品安全在刑法保护方面的不足，提出相应的修改意见，以求重构食品安全的刑法保护体系，实现法律法规之间的有效对接，，并立足实践，以更好地预防和打击危害食品安全犯罪，从而有效遏制食品安全犯罪的发生。
[Abstract]:Food is the primary material for human survival and development. Food safety is related to the national economy and people's livelihood, and there are problems in food safety, which not only damages the health and safety of the human body. It will also damage the stability of economic and social development. The publication and implementation of the Food Safety Law on June 1, 2009 puts forward new requirements for the criminal law regulation of crimes against food safety. The current Criminal Law of our country adjusts the behavior of production and operator in the market and the behavior of the subject of food safety supervision. However, as far as the current situation is concerned, these two aspects are classified and charged with crimes. There are contradictions with the Food Safety Law, and there are shortcomings in the operation in practice. Through the Yiyang black lard incident and Sanlu milk powder incident in Hunan Province as the main line of the article, this paper mainly involves the main charges of food safety crime, such as the crime of production, sale of toxic and harmful food, production. This paper analyzes the crime of sales not in accordance with food safety standards and the crime of illegal business, reflects on the regulation of food safety criminal law, tries to re-examine the shortcomings of the current food safety in the protection of criminal law, and puts forward corresponding suggestions for amendment. In order to reconstruct the criminal law protection system of food safety, realize the effective docking between laws and regulations, and based on practice, in order to better prevent and combat crimes against food safety, so as to effectively curb the occurrence of food safety crimes.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16;D924.3
本文编号：2488684
[Abstract]:Food is the primary material for human survival and development. Food safety is related to the national economy and people's livelihood, and there are problems in food safety, which not only damages the health and safety of the human body. It will also damage the stability of economic and social development. The publication and implementation of the Food Safety Law on June 1, 2009 puts forward new requirements for the criminal law regulation of crimes against food safety. The current Criminal Law of our country adjusts the behavior of production and operator in the market and the behavior of the subject of food safety supervision. However, as far as the current situation is concerned, these two aspects are classified and charged with crimes. There are contradictions with the Food Safety Law, and there are shortcomings in the operation in practice. Through the Yiyang black lard incident and Sanlu milk powder incident in Hunan Province as the main line of the article, this paper mainly involves the main charges of food safety crime, such as the crime of production, sale of toxic and harmful food, production. This paper analyzes the crime of sales not in accordance with food safety standards and the crime of illegal business, reflects on the regulation of food safety criminal law, tries to re-examine the shortcomings of the current food safety in the protection of criminal law, and puts forward corresponding suggestions for amendment. In order to reconstruct the criminal law protection system of food safety, realize the effective docking between laws and regulations, and based on practice, in order to better prevent and combat crimes against food safety, so as to effectively curb the occurrence of food safety crimes.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16;D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜代境;论共犯之共犯[J];西北政法学院学报;1986年04期
2 赵颖;韩迎光;;生产、销售有毒有害食品罪的刑法规制及其司法防范[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2011年04期
3 左德起;林慧;;从食品安全法实施中看刑事责任的完善[J];中国公共安全(学术版);2009年04期
4 侯亦杨;;论“三鹿奶粉事件”的因果关系[J];法制与社会;2009年17期
5 卢建平;方翌;;完善食品安全的刑法保护[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
6 刘亚男;;从“三鹿奶粉”事件谈我国的假冒伪劣产品规制[J];全国商情(经济理论研究);2009年10期
7 丁立新;;“三鹿”系列刑案开审[J];检察风云;2009年02期
8 张保红;刘洪华;;三鹿奶粉事件的法律分析[J];五邑大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
9 卢有学;;“三鹿奶粉”系列案定性探疑[J];西南政法大学学报;2009年05期
10 肖元;;对食品安全刑法保护的思考[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2006年02期
本文编号：2488684
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2488684.html
