利益博弈视角下我国大气污染控制制度设计问题研究——个体理性和集体理性的矛盾与经济法界限

发布时间：2018-01-31 00:48

本文关键词： 利益博弈制度设计大气污染经济法界限　出处：《法学杂志》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：大气环境容量资源作为一种稀缺的公共资源,具有消费的非竞争性和非排他性,个体理性与集体理性之间的矛盾导致其在资源配置中存在市场失灵的情况,需要国家以经济法的形式干预大气环境容量资源配置。考虑到政府干预界限应该与法治能力相一致,大气污染控制制度设计应界定政府经济人界限,合理进行收费权、处罚权等部门配置,避免部门争权夺利而影响监管效率;界定经济法干预成本界限,定量化对比政府干预行为的成本与收益,选择理性干预;加大大气控制制度处罚力度,处罚数额高于其治污成本的2倍以上,保障制度的有效性;实现大气污染总量控制,促进产业结构优化升级和技术进步,有效控制大气污染,改善大气环境质量。
[Abstract]:As a scarce public resource, the atmospheric environmental capacity resource has the non-competitive and non-exclusive nature of consumption. The contradiction between individual rationality and collective rationality leads to the market failure in the allocation of resources. It is necessary for the state to intervene in the allocation of atmospheric environmental capacity resources in the form of economic law. Considering that the limit of government intervention should be consistent with the ability of ruling by law, the design of air pollution control system should define the limits of government economic man. Reasonable allocation of charge right, penalty right and other departments, to avoid the department competing for profit and affect the efficiency of supervision; Define the cost limit of economic law intervention, compare the cost and benefit of government intervention, choose rational intervention; Increasing the punishment of atmospheric control system, the amount of punishment is more than 2 times of its pollution control cost, and the effectiveness of the protection system; To control the total amount of air pollution, to promote the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure and technological progress, to effectively control air pollution and improve the quality of the atmosphere environment.
【作者单位】：吉林财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.68
【正文快照】： 随着新《环境保护法》《大气污染防治法》的顺利修改与实施,我国大气污染控制与大气环境质量保护制度日益完善,有效促进了大气污染防治与大气环境保护。但是实践中,我国部分大气污染控制制度实施效果并不理想。一方面是由于大气污染控制市场秩序与效率存在缺失,市场不能完全发

【相似文献】