论网络募捐平台连带责任之承担
发布时间:2018-02-03 05:48
本文关键词: 网络募捐 法律地位 连带责任 出处:《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着互联网时代的到来,网络募捐成为一个热门话题进入到了人们的视野当中,越来越多的人可以通过网络进行慈善捐助。然而,网络募捐带来便利的同时,也伴随着许多诈捐骗捐现象的发生。由此引发的一系列法律问题均值得我们深思,如网络募捐平台作为网络服务提供者处于何种法律地位,在进行募捐的过程中应当履行怎样的义务,出现诈捐、骗捐事件时网络募捐平台应承担什么样的民事责任等问题理应进行深入的思考。现实中,我国《慈善法》中并没有对网络募捐平台做出相应的义务性规定,于是学界对前述问题的观点便具有了可争议的空间。因此,本文尝试从民法的角度出发,对网络募捐平台的法律地位、民事义务和法律责任承担进行必要分析与阐述。主要内容如下述:第一章,主要介绍了网络募捐的特征和两种发起模式,即个人直接发起模式和个人与慈善组织共同发起模式,继而引出影响网络募捐平台在民事责任承担方面所存在的一些争议。第二章,主要对影响网络募捐平台责任承担的相关问题进行梳理分析。主要包括网络募捐平台的法律地位,有居间人说、网络空间出租者说、代理人说等,并对前述观点进行了阐述。随后文章就网络募捐平台的义务方面提出自己的观点并进行评析,本文认为网络募捐平台在募捐发起前或者募捐过程中应负有相应的审核义务和注意义务。第三章,主要对网络募捐平台单方责任之优劣进行了分析,随后又对网络募捐平台应承担连带责任进行了详细的论证。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the Internet era, online fund-raising has become a hot topic into the eyes of people, more and more people can make charitable donations through the Internet. However, Internet fundraising brings convenience at the same time. With the occurrence of many fraudulent donation fraud phenomenon, a series of legal problems are worth pondering, such as the network donation platform as a network service provider in what kind of legal status. In the process of collecting donations, what kind of obligations should be fulfilled, there are fraud donation, when the network donation collection platform should bear the civil liability and other issues should be deeply considered. In reality. The charity law of our country does not have the corresponding obligation stipulation to the network collection platform, so the academic circles have the controversial space to the above-mentioned question viewpoint. Therefore, this article tries to proceed from the angle of the civil law. The legal status of the network fundraising platform, civil obligations and legal liability to undertake the necessary analysis and elaboration. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter, mainly introduces the characteristics of the network collection and the two modes of initiation. Namely the individual direct initiation mode and the individual and the charitable organization co-sponsor pattern, then leads to the influence network fund-raising platform in the civil liability assumption aspect some disputes. Chapter two. It mainly analyzes the related problems that affect the responsibility of the network fundraising platform. It mainly includes the legal status of the network fundraising platform, some people say, cyberspace renters say, agents say, and so on. Then the article puts forward its own views and comments on the obligations of the network fundraising platform. This paper thinks that the network fundraising platform should have the corresponding audit obligation and duty of attention before or during the launching of the collection. Chapter three mainly analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the unilateral responsibility of the network fundraising platform. Subsequently, the network fundraising platform should bear joint liability for a detailed demonstration.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.182.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 方延明;追究连带责任[J];w挛胖芸,
本文编号:1486597
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1486597.html