如何监督监督者——兼谈对监察委员会的诉讼监督问题

发布时间：2018-02-28 23:19

本文关键词： 诉讼监督行政诉讼监察权特别权力关系内部行政行为　出处：《浙江社会科学》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：监察委员会的权限包括针对违纪和职务违法行为的监察权以及针对职务犯罪行为的侦查、移送起诉权两种。前者带有行政权的性质,可以纳入行政诉讼的受案范围;后者带有刑事司法权的性质,无法对其提起行政诉讼。公职人员对监察委员会提起行政诉讼的理论难题在于特别权力关系理论,但该理论在国内外都有消解的迹象,无法继续作为排除对监察行为进行行政诉讼的理由。同时,我国过去的司法实践中,存在136个以行政监察机关为被告且法院受理的行政诉讼案件,98.5%的案件是公民为了维护自己的控告检举权和知情权对行政监察机关提起的。此次的监察体制改革如果排除对监察委员会提起行政诉讼的可能,将导致改革对公民权利救济更为不利的后果。
[Abstract]:The competence of the supervisory committee includes the supervision power of violating discipline and duty illegal acts and the investigation of crimes committed by duty. The former has the nature of administrative power and can be included in the scope of accepting cases in administrative proceedings. The latter has the nature of criminal jurisdiction, it is impossible to bring administrative proceedings against it. The theoretical problem for public officials to file administrative proceedings against the supervisory committee lies in the theory of special power relations, but the theory has signs of dissolving at home and abroad. It cannot continue to be used as a reason for excluding administrative proceedings against supervisory acts. Meanwhile, in the past judicial practice in our country, There are 136 cases in which the administrative supervisory organ is the defendant and the court accepts 98.5% of the cases brought by citizens in order to protect their right to report and know. The current reform of the supervisory system, such as. If the possibility of bringing an administrative lawsuit against the supervisory commission is ruled out, Will lead to the reform of civil rights relief more adverse consequences.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学法学院;北京航空大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目《我国宪法总纲条款的规范属性与实施机制研究》(12CFX016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】