我国代孕纠纷案件分析报告

发布时间：2018-03-06 03:10

本文选题：代孕纠纷　切入点：实质焦点　出处：《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法实践中,代孕纠纷案件呈现案件类型化、裁判依据多元化、裁判结果差异化与解决机制二元化等特征,并且在审理中存在判决形式与效果等方面问题。代孕纠纷案件在当事人之间的争议焦点通常表现为补偿费用、抚养权、监护权以及探望权,但实质焦点主要有二:一是代孕协议的效力认定;二是代孕亲子关系的认定。对于前者,不宜一概适用公序良俗原则认定无效,可以对代孕纠纷予以类型化处理,区分事前与事后、商业与非商业、必要与非必要;对于后者,可以在以分娩者为母为一般规则前提下,将代孕类型区分及必要性、代孕子女成长利益作为考量要素,从而使社会伦理与子女利益得到兼顾。个案的判决为代孕案件的处理提供了有益经验,但是远不足以应对代孕中可能出现的较为复杂的衍生性问题。代孕纠纷的解决不仅仅立足于相关立法的完善,还在于司法实践通过现有规定从解释论视角对不同类型予以区别对待,从个案当中抽象出一般的裁判规范与标准,从而实现个案公平与社会正义。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, the cases of surrogate pregnancy disputes are characterized by the types of cases, the diversity of the adjudication basis, the differentiation of the adjudication results and the dualization of the resolution mechanism, etc. And there are some problems in the trial, such as the form and effect of judgment. The dispute focuses on compensation, custody, custody and visitation between the parties in the case of surrogate pregnancy. However, there are two main substantive focuses: first, the validity of surrogacy agreement; second, the relationship between surrogate parentage. For the former, it is not appropriate to apply the public order and good custom principle to determine the invalidity, and the disputes of surrogate pregnancy can be classified and dealt with. The distinction between prior and subsequent, commercial and non-commercial, necessity and non-necessity; for the latter, the distinction and necessity of the type of surrogacy and the interests of the growth of the surrogate child can be considered as factors on the premise of the general rule of taking the mother of the parturient as the general rule. Thus, the social ethics and the interests of the children can be taken into account. The judgment of individual cases provides useful experience for the handling of surrogate cases. However, it is far from enough to deal with the complicated derivative problems that may arise in surrogacy. The resolution of surrogacy disputes is not based on the perfection of relevant legislation. It also lies in the fact that judicial practice distinguishes different types of cases from the angle of interpretation and abstracts out the general norms and standards of adjudication from the individual cases so as to realize the fairness and social justice of individual cases.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.16;D923

【相似文献】