“行政决策”概念的证立及行为的刻画

发布时间：2018-03-09 15:36

本文选题：行政决策　切入点：行政行为类型　出处：《政治与法律》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：尽管"行政决策"已被大部分学者作为法学概念使用,而且学者们也从各自的角度对它进行了颇有见地的学术表达,但仍未形成共识。在实行以行政行为为对象的行政程序制度和以行政行为为"通道"的行政诉讼制度的我国,是否能够确保"行政决策"概念的成立和"行政决策"作为一类独立的行政行为,关系到能否实现对行政决策的法律规制。层层剥离对"行政决策"概念的各种"证伪"理由之外壳,便可看到"行政决策"这一特有行政现象的真实存在,经过抽象后,其可以以法学概念的形式加以表达并进而通过入法成为法律概念。在概念证立的基础上,梳理行政决策的类型,刻画行政决策行为的特征、法律属性及其与相关行政行为界分的边界,行政决策行为在行政行为体系中的独
[Abstract]:Although "administrative decision-making" has been used as a legal concept by most scholars, and scholars have expressed it from their own perspectives, However, there is still no consensus. In our country, the administrative procedure system, which takes the administrative act as the object and the administrative litigation system with the administrative act as the "passageway", Whether it can ensure the establishment of the concept of "administrative decision" and "administrative decision" as a kind of independent administrative act, It is related to whether the legal regulation of administrative decision can be realized. By peeling off the shell of various "false" reasons for the concept of "administrative decision", we can see the real existence of the unique administrative phenomenon of "administrative decision". It can be expressed in the form of the concept of law and then become a legal concept through the introduction of law. On the basis of the proof of the concept, it can sort out the types of administrative decision-making and depict the characteristics of administrative decision-making behavior. The legal attribute and the boundary between the law and the related administrative action, and the independence of the administrative decision-making in the administrative action system
【作者单位】：浙江财经大学法学院;
【基金】：浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“行政决策司法审查制度研究”(项目批准号:17NDJC174YB) 上海市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划课题“重大行政决策程序法治化研究”(项目批准号:2014BFX003)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】