国家赔偿法中直接损失的法律解释

发布时间：2018-03-16 09:45

本文选题：国家赔偿法　切入点：损失赔偿　出处：《人民司法(应用)》2016年13期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：由国家赔偿法第三十六条的规定可知,对于财产权的损害,国家赔偿采取直接损失赔偿原则,间接损失不予赔偿。对此,法学理论界和实务界诸多人士颇有微词,呼吁将间接损失纳入国家赔偿范围,以全力填补受害人的损害,保障其合法权益。本文提出,与其反复争论间接损失是否应当纳入赔偿范围,不如在现有立法框架下重新解释直接损失的基本范畴,合理扩张其涵摄范围,将必然可得利益、财产贬值贬损、救济权益费用等合理损失纳入直接损失的赔偿范围,从而找寻到遵守现有法律法规规定和扩大保护当事人合法权益的平衡,在不破坏法律有效实施的前提下,最大限度地保障赔偿请求人的合法权益。此举既能节省重新修法或者立法之成本,又可充分实现受害人权益之保护。
[Abstract]:According to Article 36th of the State compensation Law, the principle of direct compensation for the damage to property rights is adopted by the state, but the indirect loss is not compensated. It is called for indirect losses to be included in the scope of state compensation in order to make full use of the damage of the victims and to protect their legitimate rights and interests. This paper suggests that it should be included in the scope of compensation for indirect losses. It is better to reinterpret the basic category of direct loss under the existing legislative framework and reasonably expand the scope of its inclusion, so that reasonable losses such as inevitable benefits, property depreciation and derogation, relief rights and interests expenses, etc., will be included in the compensation scope of direct losses. In order to find a balance between complying with the existing laws and regulations and expanding the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, without undermining the effective implementation of the law, It can not only save the cost of law revision or legislation, but also fully realize the protection of victims' rights and interests.
【作者单位】：山东省菏泽市中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】