我国消极安乐死立法现状研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 07:07

本文选题：安乐死　切入点：立法　出处：《医学与社会》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近期安乐死问题又起波澜,比利时、加拿大、法国在立法上都有突破。在我国,安乐死赞成与反对声音都很强烈,立法时机不成熟,但现实中存在非法安乐死案例,对立法形成挑战。作为放弃治疗的消极安乐死却支持者众多,不少国家和地区基本上立法也都认可。我国消极安乐死普遍存在,但缺乏立法规制,因而隐藏着放弃治疗实施故意杀人的可能,对患者近亲属和医务人员都面临被追究刑事责任的风险,通过对我国消极安乐死(即放弃治疗)立法调研和当前实际工作中放弃治疗,提出了相应对策,认可患者签署的放弃治疗意愿书和委托书法律效力,实施中应加强审批、监督,并做详细记录。
[Abstract]:The issue of euthanasia has been on the rise recently. Belgium, Canada, and France have all made breakthroughs in legislation. In our country, euthanasia is very strong in favor and opposition, and the legislative time is not ripe, but in reality there are cases of illegal euthanasia. The negative euthanasia, which is regarded as giving up treatment, has many supporters, and many countries and regions basically accept it. Negative euthanasia is common in our country, but it lacks legislative regulation. Thus hiding the possibility of giving up treatment to carry out intentional homicide, and facing the risk of being investigated for criminal responsibility to patients' close relatives and medical personnel. Through the research on the legislation of passive euthanasia (i.e. abandonment of treatment) in our country and the practice of giving up treatment at present, the corresponding countermeasures are put forward, and the legal effect of the willingness to abandon treatment and the power of attorney signed by the patient is recognized, and the examination and approval and supervision should be strengthened in the implementation. And make detailed records.
【作者单位】： "2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心;中国政法大学证据科学研究院;中国政法大学法律硕士学院;中国政法大学医药法律与伦理研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“司法鉴定服务合同研究”,编号为14YJA820023
【分类号】：D922.16

【相似文献】