论网络问责的法律规制

发布时间：2018-03-21 01:37

本文选题：网络问责　切入点：行政问责　出处：《宁波大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着网络社会的不断成熟，网络为公民行政问责提供了新的实现形式即网络问责。网络问责又可称为网络公民行政问责，是公民以网络为平台，通过批评、建议、检举、揭发等途径，针对政府及其行政人员的失职行为进行质询并要求承担责任的一种活动。网络问责是由异体问责展开的对公权力的行政问责，网络问责具有匿名性、高效性、大众性的特征。本文通过对网络问责在我国的理论基础和网络问责的主要问题、法律规制的必要性进行阐释，推导出我国网络问责机制良性发展的根本出路，即实现网络问责法律规制。近年来网络问责运行已经出现了一些问题，主要表现为问责启动时网络问责法律界限模糊，使得网络问责法律地位、问责范围没有明确；问责过程中网络问责主体素质不均，网络问责信息真实存疑，使得侵犯被问责对象权益的事件频发；问责深入时，网络问责对接机制缺乏，使得网络问责结果难以保障。可是网络问责在监督行政权力、保障公民权利、化解社会矛盾等方面起着重要的作用。运用法律手段对网络问责进行规制是最为合理的选择，以此解决网络问责运行中出现的问题，发挥网络问责强而有力的功能。这样才是对我国行政问责实践中现实需要的积极回应，才是解决我国行政问责困境的必然选择。在已有的行政理论基础之上，联系实际，可以寻找到建立网络问责法律规制的基础理论，包括网络问责的概念、网络问责的特点，网络问责动态运行模式，结合网络问责实践中存在的问题，，论证网络问责法律规制的必要性，在此基础上对网络问责进行深入研究，找到网络问责中需要进行法律规制的四个方面：划分权责界限，实现信息公开，协调权力冲突，构建对接机制。
[Abstract]:With the development of the network society, the network provides a new way to realize the citizen's administrative accountability, that is, the network accountability, which can be called the network citizen's administrative accountability, and it is the citizen who takes the network as the platform, through the criticism, the suggestion, the prosecution. It is an activity to question the government and its administrative personnel for their dereliction of duty and to assume responsibility. Network accountability is the administrative accountability of public power, which is carried out by heterogeneous accountability, which is anonymous and efficient. This paper explains the theoretical basis of network accountability in China, the main problems of network accountability, the necessity of legal regulation, and deduces the fundamental way out for the benign development of network accountability mechanism in China. That is to achieve the legal regulation of network accountability. In recent years, there have been some problems in the operation of network accountability, mainly manifested in the blurring of the legal boundaries of network accountability when the accountability starts, which makes the legal status of network accountability and the scope of accountability unclear; the quality of network accountability subjects is uneven in the process of accountability. The network accountability information is true and doubtful, which makes the violation of the rights and interests of the accountable object frequent; when the accountability goes deep, the network accountability docking mechanism is lacking, which makes the network accountability result difficult to guarantee. However, the network accountability is to supervise the administrative power. It is the most reasonable choice to use legal means to regulate the network accountability in order to solve the problems in the operation of network accountability, which plays an important role in protecting citizens' rights and resolving social contradictions. Giving full play to the strong and powerful function of network accountability is the positive response to the actual needs in the practice of administrative accountability in our country and the inevitable choice to solve the dilemma of administrative accountability in our country. On the basis of the existing administrative theory and practice, we can find the basic theory of establishing the legal regulation of network accountability, including the concept of network accountability, the characteristics of network accountability, the dynamic operation mode of network accountability. Combined with the problems existing in the practice of network accountability, this paper demonstrates the necessity of the legal regulation of network accountability, and on this basis makes a thorough study of network accountability, and finds out four aspects of legal regulation in network accountability: dividing the limits of power and responsibility. Realize information publicity, coordinate power conflict, construct docking mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】