当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

拆迁中承租人利益保障问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-24 16:48

  本文选题:拆迁 切入点:征收 出处:《沈阳师范大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:房屋是人们重要的生活、生产物质资料。近些年来,房屋资源不均衡现象越来越严重,房屋租赁成了解决这一问题的有效途径。又随着城市化进程的快速发展,房屋拆迁已成为了社会热点问题。拆迁征地纠纷关系民生,涉及人数众多,法律关系复杂,而我国城市房屋拆迁过程中仍存在着补偿制度立法不完善、拆迁补偿方式简单化等问题,导致拆迁补偿纠纷巨增,拆迁问题处理不好而会引起巨大的社会矛盾。拆迁中不仅涉及到房屋所有人的利益,也涉及到承租人作为拆迁的相关人的利益。长期以来我国在城市房屋拆迁过程中一直沿用《城市房屋拆迁管理条例》,在2011年1月19日国务院出台并实施新的《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》,从立法上解决了一些问题,但是仍存在没有明确对国有土地上房屋承租人的损失补偿等问题,以至于承租人及其相关人的切身利益得不到有效的保护。在司法实践上如何保障拆迁中承租人合法权利是本文尝试解决主要问题。 本文选择此作为研究方向,使用评价方法,预测方法,,实证分析方法,综合比较等方法,从“厦门市X工贸有限公司诉李C、金D租赁合同纠纷案”一案出发,通过案中添附房屋是否合法、拆迁补偿协议举证责任、法院依申请调查取证是否必要、依会议纪要裁判是否合法、诉争款项的性质等五个争议焦点进行充分分析,对涉拆问题进行探讨并思考,以为拆迁时房屋承租人权利保护提出一些建议和看法。 最后,对本案处理意见进行简述并对现行拆迁征收法律制度提出建议。第一,立法上,我国应对拆迁中补偿项目法定化,同时明确承租人的诉讼地位;第二,司法上,法院在审理涉拆案件时合理分配举证责任,同时应重视调解的作用;第三,自我保障时,承租人在租赁房屋时应尽到审慎注意义务。
[Abstract]:Housing is people's important life, production material. In recent years, the imbalance of housing resources has become more and more serious, housing leasing has become an effective way to solve this problem. And with the rapid development of urbanization, Housing demolition has become a hot issue in the society. The dispute over demolition of land is related to people's livelihood, involving a large number of people, and the legal relationship is complex. However, there is still imperfect legislation of compensation system in the process of urban house demolition in China. The simplification of the compensation method of demolition leads to a huge increase in the dispute of demolition and compensation, and the problem of demolition can cause huge social contradictions because of the poor handling of the problem. The demolition involves not only the interests of the owner of the house, but also the interests of the owner of the house. It also involves the interests of the lessee as the relative person of demolition. For a long time, our country has been using the "regulations on the Administration of Urban Housing demolition" in the process of urban house demolition for a long time. On January 19, 2011, the State Council promulgated and implemented a new "country". Regulations on expropriation and compensation of Housing on Land. Some problems have been solved by legislation. However, there are still problems such as the lack of explicit compensation for the loss of housing lessees on state-owned land, So that the vital interests of the lessee and its related persons can not be effectively protected. In judicial practice, how to protect the legal rights of the lessee is the main problem that this paper tries to solve. This article chooses this as the research direction, uses the appraisal method, the forecast method, the demonstration analysis method, the synthesis comparison and so on method, from Xiamen X industry and trade limited company v. Li C, Jin D lease contract dispute case, starts from the case, Whether the housing is legal or not, the burden of proof of the removal compensation agreement, whether it is necessary for the court to investigate and collect evidence according to the application, whether it is lawful to decide according to the minutes of the meeting, and the nature of the claim for money, are fully analyzed through the five focal points of the dispute. This paper probes into and ponders over the issue of demolition, and puts forward some suggestions and opinions for the protection of the right of the house lessee when the house is demolished. Finally, the author gives a brief account of the opinions of the case and puts forward some suggestions on the current legal system of demolition and expropriation. First, in legislation, China should legalize the compensation items in the demolition and clear the legal status of the lessee at the same time; second, in the judicial aspect, The court reasonably distributes the burden of proof in the trial of the case, and should attach importance to the role of mediation. Thirdly, the lessee should pay due attention to the duty of care when renting the house.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.181;D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 何虹;;完善我国城市房屋拆迁补偿范围的思考[J];北方经济;2006年16期

2 王利明;试论添附与侵权责任制度的相互关系——兼论《物权法》中添附制度的确立[J];法学杂志;2005年03期

3 王全刚;浅论经营权质押[J];法学评论;2003年03期

4 张千帆;;“新农村建设”需要制度保障[J];法学;2007年01期

5 迪力努尔·阿力木;;浅议民事诉讼的举证责任[J];法制与社会;2011年21期

6 张冬梅;;房屋租赁中的添附法律问题研究——兼评法释[2009]11号中的相关规定[J];河北法学;2010年05期

7 罗了一;浅析我国合同法的“默示条款制度”[J];汉中师范学院学报(社会科学);2003年04期

8 王丽;;浅谈房屋租赁权的对抗力[J];经济师;2007年05期

9 王元庆;赵薇;;论拆迁引起的房屋租赁合同纠纷[J];经济研究导刊;2011年05期

10 陈桂明;;民事诉讼中法院职权的弱化及其效应——兼对新旧民诉法典中几项制度的比较研究[J];法学研究;1992年06期



本文编号:1659165

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1659165.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1f266***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com