论医疗纠纷诉讼中专家辅助人制度的构建
发布时间:2018-03-24 17:29
本文选题:医疗纠纷诉讼 切入点:专家辅助人制度 出处:《广东财经大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:在医疗纠纷诉讼中,法官判决案件之关键在于查明医方具体的医疗行为是否存在过错、该过错与患方当事人所遭受的损害之间是否有因果关系。这对于缺乏医学专业知识的法官而言无疑是个巨大的难题,在患方当事人无法就医疗损害鉴定意见作出有效的质证的情况下,法官有过度依赖鉴定意见的倾向。然而,医疗鉴定意见因为医疗损害鉴定制度的原因,其公平性难以保证,法官如果对其过于依赖会严重影响司法的公正与权威。因此,医疗纠纷诉讼中亟需引入专家辅助人制度,促进医疗损害鉴定制度的改革、维护患方当事人的诉讼权利、协助法官公正决断。由于专家辅助人制度在民事诉讼中已经存在多年,无论在立法上还是实践中都能够为医疗纠纷诉讼专家辅助人制度的构建提供重要参考。有鉴于此,笔者以我国现行的专家辅助人制度为基础,结合医疗纠纷诉讼的特点,探讨在医疗纠纷诉讼这一特殊情境之下的专家辅助人制度的构建。 本文在结构上分为四章,重点论述了构建医疗纠纷诉讼中专家辅助人制度的必要性以及具体措施。 第一章主要是阐述医疗纠纷诉讼专家辅助人制度的基础理论,包括专家辅助人的概念、作用及诉讼地位。 第二章主要是对构建医疗纠纷诉讼专家辅助人制度的必要性与可行性分析。本章先分析了专家辅助人制度在医疗纠纷诉讼中的重要作用,然后介绍了构建医疗纠纷诉讼专家辅助人制度的理论基础和实践基础。 第三章主要是对域外相关制度进行考察与分析,以便借鉴域外研究成果。通过分别对美国专家证人制度、意大利技术顾问制度以及日本诉讼佐人制度中专家的资格与选任、诉讼地位和意见效力等的研究,对相关制度进行比较与评析。 第四章主要是针对我国医疗纠纷诉讼的特点,,对构建我国医疗纠纷专家辅助人制度提出立法建议。首先提出医疗纠纷专家辅助人制度的保障机制;其次,从专家辅助人的资格、参与诉讼的程序、法律责任以及专家辅助人意见的采信规则几个方面提出了构建医疗纠纷专家辅助人制度的基本设想。
[Abstract]:In the medical dispute litigation, the key of the judge to judge the case is to find out whether the medical action of the doctor is at fault, Whether there is a causal link between the fault and the damage suffered by the affected party is a huge problem for judges who lack medical expertise. When the party concerned is unable to make an effective cross-examination on the opinion of medical damage appraisal, the judge tends to rely excessively on the opinion. However, because of the reasons of the medical damage appraisal system, the fairness of the opinion is difficult to guarantee. If the judge is too dependent on it, it will seriously affect the justice and authority of the judicature. Therefore, it is urgent to introduce the expert assistant system in the medical dispute litigation, to promote the reform of the medical injury appraisal system, and to safeguard the litigant rights of the patients. Assist the judge to make a fair decision. Since the expert assistant system has existed in civil litigation for many years, it can provide an important reference for the construction of the expert assistant system in medical dispute litigation both in legislation and in practice. Based on the current expert assistant system in our country and the characteristics of medical dispute litigation, the author discusses the construction of expert assistant person system under the special situation of medical dispute litigation. This paper is divided into four chapters. It mainly discusses the necessity and concrete measures of constructing the expert assistant system in medical dispute litigation. The first chapter mainly expounds the basic theory of the medical dispute litigation expert assistant system, including the concept, function and litigation status of the expert assistant. The second chapter mainly analyzes the necessity and feasibility of constructing the medical dispute litigation expert assistant system. This chapter first analyzes the important role of the expert assistant person system in the medical dispute litigation. Then it introduces the theoretical and practical basis of constructing the medical dispute litigation expert assistant system. The third chapter is mainly about the investigation and analysis of the extraterritorial related systems, in order to draw lessons from the overseas research results. Through the expert witness system in the United States, the technical adviser system in Italy and the qualification and selection of experts in the Japanese litigation system, The research of litigation status and opinion effect, and so on, carries on the comparison and the appraisal to the related system. The fourth chapter mainly aims at the characteristic of medical dispute litigation in our country, and puts forward the legislative suggestion to construct the medical dispute expert assistant person system in our country. First, it puts forward the safeguard mechanism of medical dispute expert assistant person system; secondly, it puts forward the safeguard mechanism of the medical dispute expert assistant person system. This paper puts forward the basic idea of constructing the system of expert assistant in medical disputes from the aspects of the qualification of expert assistant, the procedure of participating in litigation, the legal responsibility and the rule of acceptance of expert assistant's opinion.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16;D925.1;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐继军,谢文哲;英美法系专家证人制度弊端评析[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2004年03期
2 蒋奎;詹启奎;;对医疗过错司法鉴定中几个关键问题的思考[J];中国司法;2009年02期
3 郑昱;;论英美法系专家证人制度对我国的借鉴[J];海峡法学;2011年02期
4 邢学毅;;论在医疗纠纷诉讼中推行专家辅助人制度[J];证据科学;2009年03期
5 卢建军;;司法鉴定结论使用中存在问题及解决途径——兼论我国诉讼专家辅助人制度的建构和完善[J];证据科学;2010年06期
6 陈志华;;医学会从事医疗损害鉴定之合法性研究[J];证据科学;2011年03期
7 范加庆;朱丽云;;浅谈我国专家辅助人制度[J];法制与社会;2011年17期
8 左宁;;我国刑事专家辅助人制度基本问题论略[J];法学杂志;2012年12期
9 孙则政;;“有专门知识的人”之职能分析与制度完善[J];公民与法(法学版);2013年06期
10 刘景亮;;“有专门知识的人”意见效力初析[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张英;一元处理机制下医疗损害责任制度研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
本文编号:1659305
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1659305.html