行政允诺行为探析

发布时间：2018-03-27 15:36

本文选题：行政允诺　切入点：责任政府　出处：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随着市场经济的发展、政治民主化进程的不断加深,政府在不断向服务型政府转型过程中也面临着许多问题,如何让处理好政府和公众之间的关系、提高行政管理水平则是其中的重中之重。行政允诺行为由于其非强制性和柔性的行为特征,在扩大公众参与、提升政府公信力方面的重要价值被行政机关所青睐。行政允诺的实施产生了良好的社会效果,其对促进政府信息公开、维护社会稳定等方面的重要作用也得到了越来越多的重视。但是,立法和配套制度的缺失、相关理论研究的匮乏使得行政允诺行为的发展缺乏后劲,并产生了组多问题。为规范行政允诺行为,2004年最高人民法院发布的《案由通知》,将行政允诺作为一种行为可诉的行政行为列入人民法院的行政诉讼受案范围,但是并没有对行政相对人的相关权利及行政允诺诉讼中涉及到的一些问题做出回应。因此,在实践中造成了人民法院不受理或者受理相关行政允诺行为案件之后久拖不决,客观上浪费了司法资源,加重了行政相对人的维权成本。这种情况的出现,对当前已经十分紧张的政府与民众之间的关系无疑来说是雪上加霜,对维护政府的权威形象和相对人的合法权益来说也是十分不利的。行政允诺在我国行政机关实际的行政管理中得到了广泛的运用,取得了良好的社会效果,但由于对行政允诺行为相关理论和制度上的研究的缺失,导致在实施过程中行政允诺行为的许多相关法律制度问题都不尽如人意,亟待完善,笔者期望这篇文章的一些浅薄的观点和建议,能够对行政允诺行为制度的发展尽绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:With the development of market economy and the deepening of the process of political democratization, the government is faced with many problems in the process of transition to service-oriented government. How to handle the relationship between the government and the public, Improving the level of administration is one of the most important issues. Due to its non-mandatory and flexible behavior, administrative promise is expanding public participation. The important value of improving the credibility of the government is favored by the administrative organs. The implementation of the administrative promise has produced good social effects, which can promote the publicity of government information. More and more attention has been paid to the important role of maintaining social stability. However, the lack of legislation and supporting systems, and the lack of relevant theoretical research, make the development of administrative promise behavior lack of stamina. In order to standardize the administrative promise behavior, the Supreme people's Court issued the case notice in 2004, which included the administrative promise as an act actionable administrative act to be included in the scope of the administrative lawsuit accepted by the people's court. However, it has not responded to the relevant rights of the administrative counterpart and some problems involved in the administrative promise litigation. Therefore, in practice, the people's court has caused the people's court not to accept or accept the relevant administrative promise behavior cases for a long time. Objectively, judicial resources have been wasted, and the cost of safeguarding the rights of the administrative counterpart has been increased. The emergence of this situation undoubtedly makes the relationship between the government and the people even more difficult, which is already very tense at present. It is also very disadvantageous to safeguard the authoritative image of the government and the legitimate rights and interests of the relative person. The administrative promise has been widely used in the actual administration of our country's administrative organs, and has achieved good social results. However, due to the lack of theoretical and institutional research on administrative promise behavior, many related legal system problems of administrative promise behavior in the implementation process are not satisfactory, and need to be improved. The author hopes that some shallow views and suggestions of this article can contribute to the development of administrative promise behavior system.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】