公共部门编制内外员工同工同酬的司法保护——基于178件“同工同酬”诉讼案件的司法裁判结果分析

发布时间：2018-03-29 14:57

  本文选题：《劳动合同法》　切入点：立法双轨制　出处：《西安财经学院学报》2017年03期

【摘要】：文章通过对公共部门编制外劳动者所遭遇的同工不同酬的178个案件进行统计及文本分析,发现有176个案件同工同酬的诉求没有得到法院支持。法院的裁判理由主要集中在受编制所限、劳动关系双方已约定报酬、用人单位有报酬决定权等几个方面。这些理由最终可归结为立法双轨制对劳动者身份分层的制度固化、第11条立法目标与现实结果的巨大差距、理论层面对同工同酬的界定不清等深层次原因。因此,我国不同身份的劳动者实现同工同酬要根据我国的社会现实所给予的司法空间寻求相应的突破点。
[Abstract]:This paper makes statistical and textual analysis on 178 cases of unequal pay for equal work encountered by workers outside the public sector. It was found that the claim of equal pay for equal work in 176 cases was not supported by the court. The employer has the right to decide on remuneration and so on. These reasons can be attributed to the fixed system of the double track system of legislation on the stratification of the laborer's identity, and the huge gap between the legislative goal of Article 11 and the actual result. In theory, the definition of equal pay for equal work is not clear and other deep-seated reasons. Therefore, the realization of equal pay for equal work by different status workers in China should seek corresponding breakthrough points according to the judicial space given by the social reality of our country.
【作者单位】： 西北工业大学人文经法学院;
【基金】：陕西省社会科学基金资助项目(12E069) 2014年西工大人文振兴基金资助项目(3102014RW0033)
【分类号】：D922.11;D922.5
，

本文编号：1681635