行政程序证明责任真伪辨

发布时间：2018-04-03 18:31

本文选题：行政行为　切入点：证明责任　出处：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：证明责任作为常见的法律术语一般都能正确使用,但是在行政程序语境中却容易犯错。行政法律关系的非对称性决定了行政程序中行政机关的自向证明与证明责任的他向证明本质上是不同的。在行政程序中无论是依职权作出的行政行为还是依申请作出的行政行为,一般都不存在证明责任,仅在少数特殊情形下即作出行政行为的行政机关处于居中裁判地位,其他行政机关和行政相对人以及行政相对人之间处于对立关系时才存在证明责任的分配问题。如果需要描述行政机关在行政程序中的证明责任,应当使用"全面调查"一词,全面调查不仅包括通常所说应当收集有利和不利的证据,还包括收集证据的广度和深度。
[Abstract]:As a common legal term, burden of proof can be used correctly, but it is easy to make mistakes in the context of administrative procedure.The asymmetry of the administrative legal relationship determines that in the administrative procedure, the self-directed proof and the burden of proof of the administrative organ are essentially different.In the administrative procedure, no matter whether it is an administrative act made ex officio or an administrative act made in accordance with an application, there is generally no burden of proof, and only in a few special circumstances, the administrative organ that has done the administrative act is in the middle of the judgment position.The distribution of burden of proof exists only when other administrative organs and administrative counterpart and administrative counterpart are in the opposite relationship.If there is a need to describe the burden of proof of an administrative organ in an administrative proceeding, the term "full investigation" should be used, which includes not only evidence that is generally said to be beneficial and unfavourable, but also the breadth and depth of evidence to be collected.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学博士后流动站;
【基金】：北京市法制办资助项目“行政复议证据规则实证研究——以复议法改革为背景”(23213073)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.11

【相似文献】