当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

大陆和台湾就业促进法律制度比较研究

发布时间:2018-04-12 11:57

  本文选题:就业促进 + 就业保险 ; 参考:《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:就业促进,是指为了保障公民劳动权利顺利实现,由国家、社会及用人单位通过提供就业机会、创造就业条件、训练职业技能等措施来推动劳动者就业的过程。我国人口众多,是世界上人口和劳动力最多的国家,就业问题也多种多样,随着社会经济的不断发展,转轨就业、高校毕业生就业、农村大量劳动力剩余等就业问题日益严重。针对就业问题,中央及各级政府出台各种促进就业政策、建立健全公共就业服务市场,以期降低失业率推动全民就业。然而,这些政策规章过于原则性,仅仅停留在口号的层面,其宣誓作用远大于实践操作性。同时由于政策的易变性,造成就业促进在实践执行中的混乱。因此,建立科学完善的就业促进法律制度对推动我国就业促进十分必要。随着就业促进法等相关制度的颁布实施,我国就业促进法律制度已初步成体系,但由于就业促进法是就业促进政策法律化的产物,缺乏可操作性。同时,因为我国就业促进法律制度失业保险的属性,在失业保险制度中就业促功能不是首位的,不能有效充分发挥其促进就业功能。并且因我国经济发展的严重不均衡及城乡就业的二元属性,各地政府用于就业促进的经费大不相同、城市和农村就业促进的发展存在很大差距,导致各地有关就业促进的劳动力市场在落实就业服务措施方面存在很大差别。相比较而言,台湾的就业促进已经发展了很多年,有了很丰富的实践经验,在实施就业促进方面取得了很好的成果。不仅设立了就业保险制度,而且颁布了一整套完善成熟的就业促进法律制度。鉴于大陆和台湾在社会文化、法律制度等方面的高度相似性,笔者希望通过两岸就业促进法律制度的比较研究,发现两者各自在就业促进法律制度内容及结构上的优点和不足,进而学习台湾相关成熟的实践经验,探索出现阶段适合大陆的就业促进法律制度。使得大陆就业促进法律制度更加科学化完善化,以便最大程度的发挥就业促进功能、降低失业率、促进社会稳定,实现社会经济的和谐稳定发展。
[Abstract]:Employment promotion refers to the process of promoting the employment of workers by providing employment opportunities, creating employment conditions, training vocational skills and so on, in order to ensure the smooth realization of citizens' labor rights.Our country has a large population and the largest labor force in the world, and the employment problems are also varied. With the development of social economy, the transition to employment, the employment of college graduates, the surplus of a large number of rural labor force and other employment problems are increasingly serious.In view of the employment problem, the central government and the governments at all levels have issued various policies to promote employment and establish and improve the public employment service market in order to reduce the unemployment rate and promote full employment.However, these policies and regulations are too principled to remain at the level of slogans.At the same time, due to the volatility of policy, employment promotion in practice in the implementation of confusion.Therefore, it is necessary to establish a scientific and perfect legal system for employment promotion in China.With the promulgation and implementation of the employment promotion law and other related systems, the employment promotion legal system of our country has been initially systemized, but because the employment promotion law is the product of employment promotion policy legalization, it is lack of maneuverability.At the same time, because of the attribute of unemployment insurance in the legal system of employment promotion in our country, the function of promoting employment is not the first in the system of unemployment insurance, and it can not give full play to its function of promoting employment.And because of the serious imbalance of economic development and the dual attribute of urban and rural employment, the funds used by local governments for employment promotion are very different, and there is a big gap between urban and rural employment promotion development.As a result, local employment promotion of the labor market in the implementation of employment services measures are very different.In contrast, Taiwan's employment promotion has developed for many years, with rich practical experience and good results in the implementation of employment promotion.Not only has the employment insurance system been established, but also a set of mature employment promotion laws have been promulgated.In view of the high similarity between the mainland and Taiwan in the aspects of social culture and legal system, the author hopes to find out the advantages and disadvantages of the two sides in the content and structure of the employment promotion legal system through the comparative study of the cross-strait employment promotion legal system.Then we study Taiwan's relevant mature practical experience and explore the employment promotion legal system suitable for mainland China.In order to maximize the function of employment promotion, reduce unemployment rate, promote social stability and realize the harmonious and stable development of social economy, the mainland's employment promotion legal system is more scientific and perfect.
【学位授予单位】:深圳大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.5

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李光晨;;略论我国警察的职业训练[J];广州市公安管理干部学院学报;2004年02期

2 刘国翰;阳盛益;张建伟;;日本的公共职业训练:准市场机制的实践与启示[J];浙江工商大学学报;2012年01期

3 林宪鹏;;战后日本的职业训练问题浅析[J];日本研究;1986年04期

4 张炳富;;香港青年的职业训练[J];青年探索;1990年03期

5 孙启林;韩国的职业训练制度述评[J];外国问题研究;1994年04期

6 ;大韩民国职业训练基本法(1981年12月31日)[J];现代技能开发;1995年07期

7 翁文;;谈构建公安民警职业训练新体系[J];公安学刊(浙江警察学院学报);2010年06期

8 陈德祥;;坚持改革创新 积极开展警察正规化职业训练[J];公安教育;2006年09期

9 ;香港盲人辅导会[J];实用防盲技术;2008年04期

10 韦鹏;;香港明爱助推残疾人职业发展[J];社会工作(上半月);2010年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前8条

1 记者 黄顺邋通讯员 陈忠群;我市警方职业训练教官制度实施[N];深圳商报;2007年

2 刘有才 罗 霖;深圳:十万元可办职业培训所[N];人民法院报;2003年

3 本报记者 李白蕾;市职业训练中心3年助3万人就业[N];福州日报;2011年

4 深圳商报记者 崔霞;市人大拟立法保护个人捐赠[N];深圳商报;2002年

5 王大军;日本无工作年轻人剧增[N];中国文化报;2002年

6 王 娟;美国的法官培训[N];人民法院报;2003年

7 清华大学经济管理学院;MBA是职业训练不是硕士学位[N];亚太经济时报;2001年

8 清华大学经济管理学院;MBA是职业训练不是硕士学位[N];中国经营报;2001年

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 王俊飞;大陆和台湾就业促进法律制度比较研究[D];深圳大学;2017年

2 李彬彬;基于“职业能力开发基本计划”的日本公共职业训练研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2014年



本文编号:1739629

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1739629.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7ccad***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com