当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

苏州市卫生行政处罚现况分析及对策研究

发布时间:2018-05-18 10:42

  本文选题:行政处罚 + 现况分析 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的 通过对2010-2012年苏州市卫生监督所实施的行政处罚案例进行整理分析,了解行政相对人主要违法行为和卫生监督部门依法行政情况,分析违法行为的具体情况,找出行政相对人违法的高危环节,也就是卫生监督工作的重点。同时探讨行政处罚工作的经验和影响因素,为卫生行政部门制定政策提供依据,为建立职责明确、机构健全、严格执法的卫生监督机构提出对策和建议,从而提高卫生行政执法公平、公正,促进依法行政水平。 方法 采用文献查阅方法,围绕研究内容,通过中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台等文献数据库,收集包括期刊文献、论文、政府机构文件、法律法规等文献。按照处罚案卷立案时间先后顺序,对案卷中有关信息进行分析统计,用Excel建立数据库,用统计软件SPSS17.0对资料进行统计描述、卡方检验等。 结果 以工作检查发现为来源的卫生行政处罚案件数从2010年到2012年呈递增趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.226,p0.05);以社会举报为来源的案件数从2010年到2012年呈递减趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=57.733,p0.001);以监测报告为来源的案件数从2010年到2012年呈递增趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.494,p=0.009)。 从行政处罚案件处罚种类分布情况来看,处罚种类为警告的卫生行政处罚案件数2012年显著低于前两年,差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.447,p=0.002);处罚种类为罚款的案件数2011年显著低于2010年和2012年,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.094,p=0.029);处罚种类为警告、罚款及没收违法所得或物品的案件,2010年到2012年呈递增趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.125,p0.001)。 从行政处罚案件专业类别分布情况来看,餐饮服务、公共场所和消毒产品及传染病三个类别案件数从2010年到2012年均呈递增趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2分别为10.146,31.512,11.852,p值均0.05);饮用水及涉水产品类案件数2011年和2012年显著少于2010年,差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.695,p0.001)。 结论 1、卫生行政处罚案件主要来源于日常的卫生监督检查,在加强日常卫生监督检查的同时,需不断拓宽卫生行政处罚案件的来源,重视对投诉举报、其他部门移送等方面案件线索的梳理。 2、处罚案件主要集中在1万元以下,重大案件的查处能力较弱。日常卫生监督检查中,发现线索的灵敏度和调查取证的能力不强。 3、餐饮服务领域查处力度较大,其他领域查处力度不足。 4、案件处罚领域狭窄,主要集中在部分违法领域。
[Abstract]:Purpose Through sorting out and analyzing the cases of administrative punishment imposed by the health supervision in Suzhou from 2010 to 2012, we can understand the main illegal acts of the administrative counterpart and the administrative situation of the health supervision department according to law, and analyze the specific situation of the illegal acts. Find out the high-risk link that the administrative relative person breaks the law, also is the focal point of the health supervision work. At the same time, it discusses the experience and influence factors of administrative punishment, provides the basis for health administrative departments to formulate policies, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for the establishment of health supervision agencies with clear responsibilities, sound institutions and strict law enforcement. In order to improve health administrative law enforcement fairness, justice, promote the level of administration according to law. Method This paper adopts the method of literature reference, and collects documents including periodical documents, papers, government agency documents, laws and regulations and so on, through the literature databases such as China knowledge Network, Wanfang data knowledge Service platform and so on. According to the order of the record filing time of the punishment file, the relevant information in the case file is analyzed and counted, the database is established by Excel, the data is described by the statistical software SPSS17.0, and the chi-square test is carried out. Result The number of cases of health administrative punishment from 2010 to 2012 showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012 (蠂 ~ 2 = 11.226p 0.05), and the number of cases reported by society was decreasing from 2010 to 2012. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 / 57.733 / p 0.001), and the number of cases from the monitoring report showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012 (蠂 ~ 2 / 9.494 / p 0.009). According to the distribution of punishment types in administrative punishment cases, the number of health administrative punishment cases with warning in 2012 was significantly lower than that in the previous two years, and the difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 / 12.447 / p 0.002). The number of cases with fines in 2011 was significantly lower than that in 2010 and 2012. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 / 7.094p ~ (0.029), and the types of punishment were warning, fines and confiscation of illegal gains or articles, which showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012 (蠂 ~ (2) (蠂 ~ (2) (16.125) (蠂 ~ (2) (P _ (0.001). From the distribution of professional categories of administrative punishment cases, the number of cases in the three categories of catering services, public places, disinfection products and infectious diseases showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 = 10.146 卤31.512 / 11.852), and the number of cases in drinking water and related water products in 2011 and 2012 was significantly lower than that in 2010 (蠂 ~ 2 = 22.695 / p 0.001). Conclusion 1. Health administrative punishment cases mainly come from routine health supervision and inspection. While strengthening daily health supervision and inspection, it is necessary to constantly broaden the sources of health administrative punishment cases and pay attention to reporting complaints. Other departments transfer and other aspects of the case clue combing. 2. Punishment cases are mainly under 10,000 yuan, and the ability to investigate and deal with major cases is weak. The sensitivity of finding clues and the ability to investigate and collect evidence are not strong in daily health supervision and inspection. 3, the catering service area investigation and punishment strength is big, the other domain investigation and punishment dynamics is insufficient. 4, the case punishment domain is narrow, mainly concentrates in the partial illegal domain.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16;R197.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 左晨;李秋林;段玉林;周歆;王静楠;;卫生监督派出机构的建立及其工作模式[J];中国公共卫生管理;2007年05期

2 谢生华;论行政处罚中当事人的申辩权——对行政处罚听证程序的几点思考[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2003年05期

3 伏晓;;卫生监督体制改革与卫生监督体系建设的进展和思考[J];北方药学;2013年09期

4 王蛟;赵衡文;;125件医疗执业行政处罚案件分析[J];实用预防医学;2013年06期

5 高强;以"三个代表"重要思想为指导,坚持科学发展观,加快卫生事业改革与发展——在2004年全国卫生工作会议上的讲话(摘要)[J];中国卫生产业;2004年05期

6 崔新;何翔;张文红;王汉松;李程跃;张天旭;郝模;;我国卫生监督体系的历史沿革[J];中国卫生监督杂志;2007年02期

7 谷政;蒋收获;陈刚;王义;徐天强;孙梅;陈文;郝模;;我国卫生监督领域现存问题界定研究[J];中国卫生监督杂志;2008年01期

8 周双桥;窦志勇;席荔梅;华伟;何继绥;崔天寿;于开跃;;辽宁省农村卫生监督体系建设调研报告[J];中国卫生监督杂志;2009年04期

9 李延平;;试论我国卫生监督机构建设的基本模式[J];中国卫生监督杂志;2009年06期

10 陆仲寅;;苏州市卫生监督派出机构建设现状分析和对策[J];中国卫生监督杂志;2010年04期



本文编号:1905526

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1905526.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cef98***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com