行政复议和解标的之拓展考

发布时间：2018-05-19 21:20

本文选题：复议和解 + 和解标的　；参考：《浙江大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：2007年,《行政复议法实施条例》创设了行政复议和解制度,首次将和解这一“乡土中国”的传统解纷方式引入行政救济规范。目前,行政复议和解相关法律规范仅将行政复议和解的标的确定为行政裁量,行政复议和解实践因此“循规蹈矩”,将行政复议和解标的限于行政裁量中的和解,这阻碍了行政复议和解制度优势的极大发挥。不过,与此同时,也有部分行政复议相关案例的和解实践积极回应了行政复议过程对事实不清或法律关系不明状态等裁量以外的标的进行和解的制度可能。对相关行政复议法律规范的规范解读显示,行政复议和解标的并非仅限于行政裁量,事实不清或法律关系不明状态纳入复议和解的标的范围符合行政复议和解法律规范的漏洞填补疆域,而且国内外学界关于事实不清或法律关系不明状态下缔结和解契约的探讨,也为行政复议和解标的拓展至事实不清或法律关系不明状态下的和解提供了理论支持,行政复议过程中对事实不清或法律关系不明等裁量以外的标的进行和解并无制度障碍。但是,我们也应看到,在行政复议和解标的拓展进路中,行政复议个案基于事实不清或法律关系不明状态下的和解存在侵害依法行政与公共利益的风险,防范行政复议过程中的个案和解侵害依法行政与公共利益,应成为行政复议和解标的拓展制度设计中的关键。具体包括个案复议和解应基于公众参与和诚实信用运作,以缔结和解协议为必要,以公开为原则,以不公开为例外。
[Abstract]:In 2007, the regulations on the implementation of the Administrative reconsideration Law established the system of administrative reconsideration and reconciliation, which for the first time introduced reconciliation, the traditional solution of "native China", into the standard of administrative relief. At present, the relevant legal norms of administrative reconsideration and reconciliation only determine the object of administrative reconsideration and settlement as administrative discretion, so the practice of administrative reconsideration and reconciliation "follows the rules" and limits the subject of administrative reconsideration settlement to settlement in administrative discretion. This hinders the great advantage of the administrative reconsideration and reconciliation system. However, at the same time, there are some cases of administrative review related to the settlement of the practice of positive response to the administrative review process of unclear facts or unclear legal relations such as the status of the settlement of the system other than the system. The normative interpretation of the relevant legal norms of administrative reconsideration shows that the object of settlement of administrative reconsideration is not limited to administrative discretion, The scope of the object of the reexamination and settlement is in accordance with the loopholes in the legal norms of administrative reconsideration and reconciliation. Moreover, the scholars at home and abroad discuss the conclusion of the settlement contract under the condition of unclear facts or unclear legal relations. It also provides theoretical support for the expansion of the subject of administrative reconsideration settlement to the settlement in the state of unclear facts or unclear legal relations. In the process of administrative reconsideration, there are no institutional obstacles to the settlement of objects other than unclear facts or unclear legal relations. However, we should also see that in the course of the expansion of the subject of administrative reconsideration settlement, the settlement of administrative reconsideration cases based on unclear facts or unclear legal relations has the risk of encroaching on the administrative and public interests according to law. To prevent the case settlement in the process of administrative reconsideration from encroaching on the administration according to law and public interests should be the key to the design of the expansion system of the subject of administrative reconsideration settlement. In particular, the case review and settlement should be based on public participation and good faith operation, the conclusion of a settlement agreement is necessary, the principle of openness is open, and the exception is not open.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.11

【参考文献】