重大科技决策事后评价机制研究——以内部行政法为视角

发布时间：2018-05-28 13:54

本文选题：法治政府 + 政府决策　；参考：《行政论坛》2015年06期

【摘要】：我国将合法性审查、风险评估、集体讨论、专家论证、公众参与作为重大科技决策做出之前的必经程序,以保障决策的科学与民主。但是,对于重大科技决策实施之后如何实施评价,并没有得到应有的重视,在实践中存在重大科技决策事后评价的具体细化标准混乱、主体选择单一和程序的内部规制失范等问题。因此,有必要在实施重大科技决策事前评价的基础上,将事前评价与事后评价相结合,在决策主体内部细化评价标准、综合选择评价主体,按照特定评价程序,围绕重大科技决策是否合法、合理、可操作进行事后评价,通过评价总结经验,及时进行修正和完善,以此来保障重大科技决策的质量和效果。
[Abstract]:Our country will examine the legitimacy, the risk assessment, the collective discussion, the expert argument, the public participation as the important science and technology decision making must go through the procedure, in order to safeguard the decision science and the democracy. However, how to implement the evaluation after the implementation of major scientific and technological decisions has not received due attention. In practice, there is confusion in the specific refinement criteria for the post-evaluation of major scientific and technological decisions. The single choice of the subject and the internal regulation of the procedure are out of order and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to combine prior evaluation with ex post evaluation on the basis of the prior evaluation of major scientific and technological decisions, to refine the evaluation criteria within the decision-making body, to comprehensively select the evaluation subject, and to follow the specific evaluation procedure. In order to guarantee the quality and effect of the important scientific and technological decision, it is necessary to evaluate whether the important scientific and technological decision is legal, reasonable and operable, and to sum up the experience through the evaluation, and to correct and perfect it in time.
【作者单位】：燕山大学文法学院;
【基金】：河北省秦皇岛市软科学项目“秦皇岛市环境决策评估机制研究”(201502A358)
【分类号】：D922.17

【参考文献】