当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

论集体土地征收补偿范围

发布时间:2018-05-31 01:09

  本文选题:集体土地征收 + 征收范围 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:集体土地征收补偿范围是土地征收制度改革中非常重要的问题。以往人们更为关注的问题是如何提高补偿标准,然而补偿范围才是决定补偿总额的基数,因此在提高补偿标准的同时扩大补偿范围方是对农民财产权保障最有利的方式。通过对集体土地征收的地方立法文本梳理和分析,发现其中存在的问题,从理论上探讨补偿范围的基本范畴,,厘清征收范围与补偿范围之间的关系,利益说与组织说对补偿范围的影响以及补偿标准与补偿范围之间关系。进而归纳出补偿原则是前提、合法行政行为是基础、财产权补偿是原则、损失范围确定补偿范围等界定补偿范围的标准。在此基础之上,从立法论的视角构建补偿范围的基本结构。补偿范围的立法模式应当采取折衷式的立法模式,具体内容包括财产权损失和非财产权损失,财产权损失包括集体土地所有权、地上附着物所有权和依附于土地生成的他项权利;非财产权损失主要列举了精神损失和生活权损失。最后,根据不同学者建议稿尝试草拟相应的补偿范围条款。
[Abstract]:The compensation scope of collective land expropriation is a very important issue in the reform of land expropriation system. In the past, people pay more attention to how to improve the compensation standard, however, the compensation range is the base of the total compensation, so increasing the compensation standard and expanding the compensation range is the most favorable way to guarantee the farmers' property rights. Through combing and analyzing the local legislative texts of collective land expropriation, the author finds out the existing problems, probes into the basic category of compensation scope theoretically, and clarifies the relationship between expropriation scope and compensation scope. The influence of interest theory and organization theory on compensation range and the relationship between compensation standard and compensation range. Then it concludes that the principle of compensation is the premise, the legal administrative act is the foundation, the compensation of property right is the principle, the scope of compensation is determined, and so on. On this basis, the basic structure of compensation scope is constructed from the perspective of legislation theory. The legislative model of compensation scope should adopt the eclectic legislative model, which includes the loss of property right and the loss of non-property right, and the loss of property right includes collective land ownership. The ownership of aboveground attachment and other rights that depend on the formation of land; the loss of non-property rights mainly enumerates the loss of spiritual loss and right of living. Finally, according to different scholars' suggestions, it tries to draft the corresponding compensation scope clause.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.3;D922.32

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郭洁;土地征用补偿法律问题探析[J];当代法学;2002年08期

2 姜明安;行政补偿制度研究[J];法学杂志;2001年05期

3 邹爱华;符启林;;论土地征收的性质[J];法学杂志;2010年05期

4 龙翼飞;杨一介;;土地征收初论[J];法学家;2000年06期

5 李傲,夏军;试论我国行政补偿制度[J];法学评论;1997年01期

6 朱广新;;房屋征收补偿范围与标准的思考[J];法学;2011年05期

7 童航;;论集体土地征收补偿范围[J];福建法学;2012年03期

8 申建平;;对农村集体土地征收补偿范围的反思[J];比较法研究;2013年02期

9 张千帆;“公正补偿”与征收权的宪法限制[J];法学研究;2005年02期

10 朱广新;;地役权概念的体系性解读[J];法学研究;2007年04期



本文编号:1957637

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1957637.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户eb677***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com