论生产、销售伪劣产品罪与《食品安全法》之衔接——福喜事件若干问题钩沉

发布时间：2018-06-12 11:10

本文选题：福喜事件 + 食品安全法　；参考：《中国刑事法杂志》2017年03期

【摘要】：食品安全犯罪屡禁屡发的原因不在于法律规定的"不够严"而在于"不够细",刑法第140条生产、销售伪劣产品罪与《食品安全法》的衔接不畅是造成该罪在食品犯罪案件中适用困境的根本原因。以回收食品、过期食品作为原料再生产的食品应当被认定为刑法意义上的"不合格产品"。保质期兼具事实属性与法律属性,擅自延长、修改食品保质期,或者以超过保质期的原料生产食品,销售金额超过五万元的应当认定为犯罪。以"冰鲜转冰冻"方式生产的冷冻肉制品属于不符合食品安全国家标准的不合格食品,在销售金额超过五万元的情况下,应当以生产、销售伪劣产品罪论处。
[Abstract]:The reason for the repeated prohibition of food safety crimes lies not in "not being strict enough" as stipulated by law, but in "not being careful enough." Article 140 of the Criminal Law produces, The bad connection between the crime of selling fake and inferior products and the Food Safety Law is the fundamental reason for the difficulty of applying the crime in the case of food crime. Reproducing food with recycled food and expired food as raw material should be regarded as "unqualified product" in the sense of criminal law. If the shelf life has both factual and legal attributes, it shall be considered a crime to extend or modify the shelf life of the food without authorization, or to produce food with raw materials exceeding the shelf life, the sales amount exceeding 50,000 yuan shall be deemed to be a crime. Frozen meat products produced in the form of "chilled fresh to frozen" are unqualified foods that do not meet the national standards for food safety. If the sales amount exceeds 50,000 yuan, the crime of producing and selling fake and inferior products shall be punished.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学金融检察法治创新研究基地;
【分类号】：D922.16;D924.3

【相似文献】