论擅自损毁封条等环境违法行为的法律责任——兼论《查封扣押办法》第23条第2款与《治安管理处罚法》的衔接

发布时间：2018-06-14 10:04

本文选题：查封扣押 + 擅自损毁封条　；参考：《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：在环境污染备受关注、环境法修改完善、环境执法加强的背景下,同案不同罚的情况却屡有发生。因《查封扣押办法》第23条第2款未与《治安管理处罚法》相衔接,导致擅自损毁封条等环境违法行为的处罚缺乏统一标准,法律责任不明。无论从理论上分析其合理性,还是总结执法经验,擅自损毁封条等环境违法行为,应当与阻碍执法、隐藏、转移、变卖或损毁行政执法机关依法查封的财物行为的处罚相当。可以先通过行政解释,由公安部就《治安管理处罚法》第60条规定的妨害行政执法活动行为作出细化解释,或直接由环境保护部与公安部联合修改规范性文件对该行为予以明确,以更好地指导环境执法实践。然《查封扣押办法》第23条第2款与法律的衔接问题最终必须通过修改立法的方式进行解决。
[Abstract]:Under the background of environmental pollution being paid close attention to, environmental law is improved and environmental law enforcement is strengthened, different punishment of the same case occurs frequently. Because Article 23 (2) of "measures of seizure and seizure" did not link up with "Law on punishment for Public Security Management", the punishment for environmental illegal acts such as damage of seal without authorization lacks uniform standard and legal liability is not clear. Whether analyzing its rationality theoretically or summing up the law enforcement experience unauthorized damage of seal and other environmental illegal acts should be equivalent to the punishment of obstructing law enforcement hiding transferring selling or damaging property seized by administrative law enforcement agencies according to law. Through administrative interpretation, the Ministry of Public Security may make a detailed interpretation of the acts of obstruction of administrative law enforcement activities as stipulated in Article 60 of the Law on punishment for Public Security Administration, Or directly by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Public Security to modify the normative documents to clarify the behavior, in order to better guide the practice of environmental law enforcement. However, the connection between Article 23 (2) and the law must be solved by amending the legislation.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“海洋生态补偿标准与制度设计(16ZDA049)”
【分类号】：D922.14

【相似文献】