行政规范性文件司法审查研究

发布时间：2018-06-30 11:15

本文选题：行政规范性文件 + 司法审查　；参考：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在2014年11月1日新修订的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》以及之后出现的《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国行政诉讼法若干问题》等相关规定中都将人民法院对行政规范性文件进行司法审查这一个问题进行了具体规定,将在对这些相关的法条、相关的内容进行关联性论证的前提下,分析进行司法审查行政规范性文件的具体内容,发现其在内容方面法律上虽然有明确的规定,但是具体的适用过程还是存在问题的。第一部分主要是行政规范性文件的概述,首先从基本问题着手,即其概念、种类、法律地位。其次从制度层面分析,对其监督体系进行梳理,即国内外及地区对其监督体系。通过比较的方法和文献的方式将行政规范性文件的内容,以及其存在的问题体现出来,以此论述我国对其进行司法审查的必要性。第二部分主要是将行政规范性文件纳入司法审查的探索及其意义。通过从反面研究行政规范性文件存在的问题如制定主体混乱、制定程序及责任追究等方面的不健全;正面论证将行政规范性文件纳入司法审查,其是在在人民法院的法律地位、司法实践以及行政复议规定的推动,使其具有可行性。从正、反两方面探索了纳入司法审查。另外以对不同主体的意义,即对法院、对行政相对人、对规范性文件本身以及与行政复议结合角度,分析了对规范性文件纳入司法审查的意义。第三部分主要运行体系入手,具体探讨其司法审查的操作性问题,即从启动、审查、审查后的处理,来论述其基本要求。具体是对规范性文件司法审查法律文本、及其合理性阐述了启动性质是附带性审查;在审查时,则是原告资格和审查标准方面探究;最后结合法律规定,对审查后处理即认定不合法和司法建议进行论述。第四部分从保障措施着手,即一个制度的运行不仅要有运行的机制还要有保障性手段,是行政规范性文件司法审查的保障措施。从确保司法建议的有效性,到责任追究机制两方面保障司法审查。基于对行政规范性文件司法审查的研究,结合我国的实际情况,提出了具体的落实措施。
[Abstract]:In the newly amended Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China on 1 November 2014 and the subsequent provisions on the application of the Administrative procedure Law of the people's Republic of China by the Supreme people's Court The court has specified the judicial review of administrative normative documents. On the premise of demonstrating the relevance of these relevant articles of law and relevant contents, we will analyze the specific contents of the administrative normative documents for judicial review, and find that although there are clear provisions in the law on the content of the documents, But the concrete application process still exists the question. The first part is an overview of administrative normative documents, starting from the basic issues, that is, its concept, types, legal status. Secondly, it analyzes the supervision system from the system level, that is, the supervision system at home and abroad. The contents of administrative normative documents and their existing problems are reflected through comparative methods and literature, so as to discuss the necessity of judicial review of administrative normative documents in our country. The second part is the exploration and significance of bringing administrative normative documents into judicial review. By studying the problems existing in the administrative normative documents from the opposite side, such as the confusion in the formulation of the main body, the establishment of procedures and the accountability, etc., the positive demonstration of bringing the administrative normative documents into the judicial review is the legal status of the administrative normative documents in the people's courts. Judicial practice and the promotion of administrative review provisions make it feasible. From both positive and negative aspects, it explores the inclusion of judicial review. In addition, it analyzes the significance of bringing normative documents into judicial review from the point of view of the significance to different subjects, that is, to the court, to the administrative counterpart, to the normative documents themselves and to the administrative reconsideration. The third part starts with the main operating system, discusses the operational problems of judicial review, that is, discusses the basic requirements from the start and the treatment after examination. Specifically, it expounds the legal text of judicial review of normative documents and its reasonableness, which is incidental to the nature of starting; in the examination, it is the plaintiff's qualification and the standard of examination; finally, combined with the legal provisions, After the review of the determination of illegality and judicial recommendations are discussed. The fourth part starts with the safeguard measures, that is, the operation of a system should not only have the mechanism of operation but also the means of guarantee, which is the safeguard measure for the judicial review of administrative normative documents. From ensuring the effectiveness of judicial recommendations to accountability mechanisms to ensure judicial review. Based on the study of judicial review of administrative normative documents and the actual situation of our country, the concrete implementation measures are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】