行政非诉强制执行的裁执分离研究

发布时间：2018-07-20 12:40

【摘要】：行政非诉强制执行是行政强制制度的重要组成部分,2011年《行政强制法》出台对具体的执行方式没有作明确规定,法院兼审查与执行为一体的模式在司法实践中开始出现种种弊端,特别是针对房屋拆迁、土地违法这一类型的案件的执行方面,因此,法院与行政机关各司其责的裁执分离模式才是符合法治要求的改革趋势,有利于发挥法院的监督优势,又有利于发挥地方政府的行政优势。本文首先对行政非诉强制执行和裁执分离的基本概述做简要阐述,并对目前我国的运行现状进行分析,在此基础上,笔者介绍了国外关于行政强制执行的相关法律规定,通过对比分析我国目前行政非诉强制执行方面面临的一些困境,得出实行裁执分离模式的必要性,以及从适用范围、人民法院的审查标准和审查方式等方面提出完善该模式的若干建议,只有实行裁执分离模式,才能更好的在公平的价值条件下实现效率价值。
[Abstract]:The administrative non-litigation enforcement is an important part of the administrative compulsory system. In the judicial practice, the mode of court and review and enforcement has begun to appear various malpractices, especially in respect of the enforcement of the cases of house demolition and land violation, therefore, The pattern of separating the court from the administrative department is the reform trend that accords with the rule of law, which is helpful to give full play to the supervision advantage of the court and the administrative advantage of the local government. In this paper, the author first briefly describes the separation of administrative non-litigation enforcement and administrative enforcement, and analyzes the current situation of China's operation. On this basis, the author introduces the relevant foreign laws and regulations on administrative enforcement. Based on the comparative analysis of some difficulties facing the enforcement of administrative non-litigation in our country at present, the necessity of implementing the separation mode of adjudication and enforcement and the scope of application are obtained. The people's court puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect this model in terms of the standard and the way of examination. Only by implementing the separation mode can the efficiency value be better realized under the condition of fair value.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】