当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责研究

发布时间:2018-07-23 18:38
【摘要】:本文在理论研究的范畴内,从艺术品拍卖关系为大的前提出发,结合目前我国艺术品拍卖过程中的一些问题,在广义上对艺术品的概念进行整理和概括,指明艺术品应该具备的特征。从艺术品拍卖人与委托人和买受人的法律关系进行归纳和整理,分析艺术品拍卖法律关系的实质和主要特征,明确艺术品拍卖人和委托人之间委托合同的隐名代理性质。在理论的范畴清晰的阐述艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责理论的内容,为后续的研究做理论的铺垫。 在中后的章节中依然从我国艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责条款出发,从其担保免责的内涵到使用情况乃至对使用情况的质疑几个方面对目前的瑕疵担保免责条款进行分析和整理,指出目前瑕疵担保免责理论的不足之处。在国外的理论研究上,韩国、英国、美国为典型,阐述上述几个国家在相关立法上和实践中采取的与我国的不同的法律法规与措施,并进行评析,以期达到借鉴和学习的目的。最后的完善相关的建议中,主要从立法改善以及相关措施处罚,重点引入介绍艺术品担保金制度和行业鉴定委员会的设立,综合了各个方面的考量,希望对我国的艺术品瑕疵担保免责条款的改进有所帮助和改良。 本文分为五个部分: 第一部分是对艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责该课题的由来、研究现状、研究的范围和方法进行概述说明。 第二部分为艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责相关法律关系的概述,了解艺术品拍卖中的拍卖法律关系中相应的特点。 第三部分为艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责条款的研究分析总结拍卖法第六十一条,进行否定,进而阐明艺术品拍卖人瑕疵免责条款的不合理性。 第四部分为国外艺术品拍卖瑕疵的拍卖担保免责的规制,介绍了英国、美国、司法实践和经验做法,并第一次引入了韩国有关瑕疵担保的相关法律法规。 第五部分是艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保免责责任的完善意见,从对我国目前现行的拍卖法及相关法律法规的改良处罚,完善行业自治体系,在新时期下以淘宝艺术品拍卖为典型,对新型网络艺术品拍卖总结,提出艺术品瑕疵的拍卖担保金的制度。
[Abstract]:In the scope of theoretical research, from the premise of art auction relationship, combining with some problems in the process of art auction in our country at present, this paper arranges and generalizes the concept of art in a broad sense. Specify the characteristics of an art object. This paper summarizes and arranges the legal relationship between the auctioneer and the consignor and the buyer, analyzes the essence and main features of the legal relationship of the art auction, and clarifies the anonymous agency nature of the entrustment contract between the auctioneer and the consignor. In the theoretical category, the clear elaboration of the art defects auction warranty exemption theory content, for the subsequent research to do the theoretical groundwork. In the middle and later chapters, we still proceed from the auction guarantee exemption clause of our country's works of art flaw, analyze and sort out the current defect guarantee exemption clause from the connotation of its guarantee exemption to the usage and even the doubt of the usage. This paper points out the deficiency of the theory of disclaimer of defect guarantee at present. In the theoretical research of foreign countries, Korea, Britain and the United States are typical. This paper expounds the different laws and regulations and measures adopted by these countries in the relevant legislation and practice, and evaluates them in order to achieve the purpose of reference and study. In the final consummation related suggestion, mainly from the legislative improvement and the related measure punishment, introduces the introduction art guarantee fund system and the establishment of the industry appraisal committee, synthesizes each aspect consideration, The author hopes to improve the disclaimer clause of art defects in our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is about the origin of the subject, the research status, the scope and methods of the research. The second part is an overview of the legal relationship related to the auction guarantee exemption of the defects of art, understanding the corresponding characteristics of the auction legal relationship in the art auction. The third part is the research and analysis of the exemption clause of the auction guarantee for the defect of works of art. The article 61 of the auction law is summarized and negated, and then the irrationality of the exemption clause of the defect of the art auctioneer is clarified. The fourth part is the regulation of auction guarantee exemption for foreign art auction defects. It introduces the British, American, judicial practice and experience practice, and introduces the relevant laws and regulations of Korea for the first time. The fifth part is the perfection of the exemption responsibility of the auction guarantee for the defects of works of art, from the current auction law and related laws and regulations of our country to improve punishment, perfect the system of industry autonomy, in the new period, Taobao art auction as a typical, This paper summarizes the new network art auction, and puts forward the system of the auction guarantee for the defects of works of art.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.294;D922.16

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 刘宁元;;论构建我国拍卖法律制度的若干问题[J];法学;2007年06期

2 崔建远;;中国债法的现状与未来[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年01期

3 和静钧;;境外拍卖法律规范与启示[J];检察风云;2007年02期

4 宋胜春;;浅析“按现状拍卖”规则[J];中国拍卖;2006年02期



本文编号:2140280

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2140280.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b8251***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com