废除抑或改造:收容教育制度的反思和检讨

发布时间：2018-09-11 12:41

【摘要】：考察最初的制度设计,收容教育制度事实上被赋予了三大功能:惩罚功能、教育功能和医疗功能。为实现这三大功能,立法者配置了四种治理措施:治安管理处罚、收容教育、劳动教养和强制治疗。从法理和实效两个层面来看,收容教育和劳动教养的治理措施不仅难以实现教育违法行为人改善的目标,而且存在立法危机和执法困境,因而均应予以彻底废除。但是,以治安管理处罚来实现惩罚功能,具有目的和方式的相当性,应予以保留,并应归并于其他法律体系;以强制治疗来实现医疗功能,具有目的正当性,亦应予以保留,但在具体适用方面,则需要在适用主体、适用程序等方面进行重大改造。
[Abstract]:According to the original system design, the institution of education is endowed with three functions: punishment function, education function and medical treatment function. In order to realize these three functions, the legislator allocates four kinds of administrative measures: punishment of public security management, education of shelter, reeducation through labor and compulsory treatment. From the two aspects of legal theory and practical effect, the measures of rehousing education and reeducation through labor are not only difficult to achieve the goal of improving the educational offenders, but also exist legislative crisis and difficult situation of law enforcement, so they should be completely abolished. However, the realization of punishment function by public security management punishment has the equivalence of purpose and mode, which should be retained and merged into other legal systems, and compulsory treatment should be used to realize the function of medical treatment, which has the purpose of legitimacy, and should also be preserved. But in the specific application aspect, needs in the application main body, the suitable procedure and so on aspect carries on the important transformation.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：浙江省法学会2014年度重点课题“废止劳动教养制度后完善对轻微违法犯罪行为的惩办机制研究”(项目批准号:2014NA08)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.14

【参考文献】