行政合同司法审查研究
发布时间：2018-10-18 09:23
【摘要】：行政合同大量存在于行政管理实务中已是不争的客观事实,行政合同纠纷因行政合同数量的增加而增多,如何高效顺利的解决行政合同纠纷一直是备受关注的课题。我国立法已把行政合同归入行政诉讼的受案范围,司法程序是不可缺少的救济渠道,对行政合同进行司法审查十分必要。总结我国行政合同司法审查中存在的一些问题,比如诉讼模式混乱、审查原则不一、审查模式模糊,这极不利于行政合同纠纷的解决。有些国家的行政合同制度已逐渐成熟,在行政合同司法审查方面给了我国很多启示。因此,借鉴国外行政合同司法审查制度,根据我国国情,针对我国行政合同司法审查中出现的问题,提出以下完善措施:首先,统一行政合同的行政诉讼模式;其次,概括司法审查原则,根据行政规范和民事规范总结出合法、合理、合约原则;最后,以原告诉讼请求为出发点和落脚点,重点审查行政优益权,对行政合同进行全面审查,妥善解决行政合同纠纷,平衡双方利益,发挥行政合同的功能。
[Abstract]:It is an indisputable objective fact that a large number of administrative contracts exist in the practice of administrative management. The number of administrative contract disputes increases with the increase of the number of administrative contracts. How to solve administrative contract disputes efficiently and smoothly has been a subject of great concern. The legislation of our country has classified the administrative contract into the scope of accepting the case in the administrative litigation, the judicial procedure is an indispensable relief channel, it is very necessary to carry on the judicial review to the administrative contract. This paper summarizes some problems existing in judicial review of administrative contract in our country, such as confusion of litigation mode, different principles of examination and vague examination mode, which is extremely unfavorable to the settlement of disputes in administrative contract. In some countries, the system of administrative contract has matured gradually, which gives us a lot of enlightenment in judicial review of administrative contract. Therefore, draw lessons from the foreign administrative contract judicial review system, according to the situation of our country, in view of the problems in the judicial review of our administrative contract, put forward the following measures: first, unify the administrative contract administrative litigation mode; secondly, Summarize the principle of judicial review, sum up the principle of legality, reasonableness and contract according to the administrative norm and civil norm; finally, take the plaintiff's lawsuit request as the starting point and the foothold, focus on the examination of the administrative superior interest right, carry on the comprehensive examination to the administrative contract, Properly resolve disputes in administrative contracts, balance the interests of both parties, and give full play to the functions of administrative contracts.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1
本文编号：2278692
[Abstract]:It is an indisputable objective fact that a large number of administrative contracts exist in the practice of administrative management. The number of administrative contract disputes increases with the increase of the number of administrative contracts. How to solve administrative contract disputes efficiently and smoothly has been a subject of great concern. The legislation of our country has classified the administrative contract into the scope of accepting the case in the administrative litigation, the judicial procedure is an indispensable relief channel, it is very necessary to carry on the judicial review to the administrative contract. This paper summarizes some problems existing in judicial review of administrative contract in our country, such as confusion of litigation mode, different principles of examination and vague examination mode, which is extremely unfavorable to the settlement of disputes in administrative contract. In some countries, the system of administrative contract has matured gradually, which gives us a lot of enlightenment in judicial review of administrative contract. Therefore, draw lessons from the foreign administrative contract judicial review system, according to the situation of our country, in view of the problems in the judicial review of our administrative contract, put forward the following measures: first, unify the administrative contract administrative litigation mode; secondly, Summarize the principle of judicial review, sum up the principle of legality, reasonableness and contract according to the administrative norm and civil norm; finally, take the plaintiff's lawsuit request as the starting point and the foothold, focus on the examination of the administrative superior interest right, carry on the comprehensive examination to the administrative contract, Properly resolve disputes in administrative contracts, balance the interests of both parties, and give full play to the functions of administrative contracts.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曾哲;韩锦霞;;我国行政合同司法审查的实践梳理及完善路径[J];江西社会科学;2016年06期
2 高俊杰;;新《行政诉讼法》下的行政合同诉讼[J];财经法学;2016年02期
3 李广宇;;审理行政协议案件对民事法律规范的适用[J];中国法律评论;2016年01期
4 满先进;;论我国行政合同司法救济制度的不足及完善[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年06期
5 夏文菊;;论我国行政合同诉讼制度的完善——以新修改的《行政诉讼法》为视角[J];内江师范学院学报;2015年09期
6 李福忠;;新行政诉讼法确立的行政协议诉讼制度初探[J];山东审判;2015年04期
7 梁凤云;;行政协议案件的审理和判决规则[J];国家检察官学院学报;2015年04期
8 郑春燕;;大陆行政合同的审查现状与困境[J];浙江社会科学;2014年11期
9 王旭军;;论行政合同案件的类型化[J];人民司法;2014年11期
10 杨解君;陈咏梅;;中国大陆行政合同的纠纷解决:现状、问题与路径选择[J];行政法学研究;2014年01期
，本文编号：2278692
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2278692.html
