医疗纠纷适用《民法通则》第一案重新解读与检讨

发布时间：2018-10-31 17:55

【摘要】：器官异位案件损害后果的典型性及医疗过错的不典型性,不具有指导医疗损害赔偿案件的普遍意义。最高人民法院针对此案发布的司法解释,在一定程度上促成了当下医疗纠纷的非理性解决。局限于医患双方的损害赔偿思维模式,把医生与患者挤向对立,不可能根本解决医患矛盾。医患之间的责任空白带不应由医方承担。突破医疗特殊性的后果是看病更难看病更贵,医患矛盾直接演变为利益之争。医疗过错的鉴定应遵循法定程序,并以医学专业知识为基础,以理性人的合理标准作为原则。
[Abstract]:It is not of universal significance to guide medical damage compensation cases because of the typicality of the damage consequences of organ heterotopic cases and the atypical nature of medical faults. The judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme people's Court has contributed to the irrational resolution of medical disputes. Confined to the thinking mode of compensation for damages between doctors and patients, it is impossible to solve the contradiction between doctors and patients. The gap between doctors and patients should not be borne by the doctor. The consequence of breaking through the particularity of medical treatment is that it is more difficult to see a doctor and more expensive to see a doctor. The appraisal of medical fault should follow the legal procedure, take the medical professional knowledge as the foundation, take the rational person's reasonable standard as the principle.
【作者单位】：南方医科大学人文与管理学院;
【基金】：中南大学法学院陈云良教授主持的教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目《基本医疗服务保障法制化研究》(项目编号14JD025)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D922.16;D923

【参考文献】