城市违法建筑治理中的行政强制研究
发布时间：2018-12-07 17:19
【摘要】：近年来，受城市房价攀升的利益驱使以及生存压力所限，城市违法建筑迅速蔓延并处于制而不止的状态。而行政强制拆除作为最为严厉的行政治理手段，由于其牵涉面广以及影响力大，受到了社会的广泛关注。 2007年《城乡规划法》的颁布实施，，使得违法建筑强制执行模式经历了从司法执行模式到行政机关自行执行模式的转变。在治理效果得到明显提升的同时，也爆发了诸多与拆违相关的社会冲突。2012年起实施的《行政强制法》对违法建筑强制拆除作出了特别规定，在更好的保护当事人合法权益的同时，也对行政机关强制执行违法建筑提出了更为严苛的要求。 本文从违法建筑治理工作实践入手，首先梳理了我国违法建筑强制执行模式的演变以及运用到的相关法律依据。其次以上海市黄浦区拆违实施部门为实证对象，列举了违法建筑的治理现状以及行政强制执行的实施情况。接着对《行政强制法》中拆违特别条款在实施中遇到的问题进行分析。结论就我国违法建筑行政强制执行制度提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, driven by the rising interest of urban house prices and limited by the pressure of survival, urban illegal buildings are rapidly spreading and in a state of control. As the most severe means of administrative governance, the compulsory demolition of administration has been widely concerned by the society because of its wide scope and great influence. With the promulgation and implementation of the Urban-Rural Planning Law in 2007, the mode of enforcement of illegal buildings has undergone a transformation from the mode of judicial execution to the mode of self-execution of administrative organs. While the effectiveness of governance has been significantly improved, there have also been many social conflicts related to the demolition of illegal buildings. The "Administrative compulsory Law", which has been in force since 2012, has made special provisions for the compulsory demolition of illegal buildings. While protecting the legal rights and interests of the parties, it also puts forward more stringent requirements for the enforcement of illegal buildings by the administrative organs. Starting from the practice of illegal building governance, this paper firstly combs the evolution of enforcement mode of illegal building in our country and the relevant legal basis applied to it. Secondly, taking Shanghai Huangpu District illegal implementation department as the empirical object, listed the current situation of illegal building governance and the implementation of administrative enforcement. Then it analyzes the problems encountered in the implementation of the special clause in the Administrative compulsory Law. Conclusion the author puts forward some suggestions on the enforcement system of illegal construction administration in China.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1;D922.297
本文编号：2367545
[Abstract]:In recent years, driven by the rising interest of urban house prices and limited by the pressure of survival, urban illegal buildings are rapidly spreading and in a state of control. As the most severe means of administrative governance, the compulsory demolition of administration has been widely concerned by the society because of its wide scope and great influence. With the promulgation and implementation of the Urban-Rural Planning Law in 2007, the mode of enforcement of illegal buildings has undergone a transformation from the mode of judicial execution to the mode of self-execution of administrative organs. While the effectiveness of governance has been significantly improved, there have also been many social conflicts related to the demolition of illegal buildings. The "Administrative compulsory Law", which has been in force since 2012, has made special provisions for the compulsory demolition of illegal buildings. While protecting the legal rights and interests of the parties, it also puts forward more stringent requirements for the enforcement of illegal buildings by the administrative organs. Starting from the practice of illegal building governance, this paper firstly combs the evolution of enforcement mode of illegal building in our country and the relevant legal basis applied to it. Secondly, taking Shanghai Huangpu District illegal implementation department as the empirical object, listed the current situation of illegal building governance and the implementation of administrative enforcement. Then it analyzes the problems encountered in the implementation of the special clause in the Administrative compulsory Law. Conclusion the author puts forward some suggestions on the enforcement system of illegal construction administration in China.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1;D922.297
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蔡园;;浅谈违法建筑的综合治理——对合肥市“拆违”活动后续工作的探究[J];安徽建筑;2007年01期
2 李永清;;香港治理违法搭建的经验与内地之借鉴[J];上海城市管理;2010年01期
3 王岩;;强制拆除违法建筑案件若干问题探析[J];法律适用;2011年09期
4 丁晓华;;强制拆除违法建筑行为定性与规范——基于对《行政强制法》第44条的解读[J];法学;2012年10期
5 黄涧秋;;违法建筑行政强制拆除中公告程序的模式选择[J];中国房地产;2013年03期
6 吴兴国;;违法建筑治理的困境与出路[J];理论学刊;2013年07期
7 沈晖;陈瑶;;境外治理违法建筑的经验和启示[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
8 蒋拯;;违法建筑类型化研究[J];社科纵横;2012年03期
9 宋纲;贾亚强;;强制拆除违法建筑案件的司法审查[J];人民司法;2012年17期
10 邓巍;;关于违法建筑行政处罚方式的探讨——从行政比例原则看《城乡规划法》第六十四条之规定[J];人民论坛;2013年23期
本文编号：2367545
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2367545.html
