机动车“尾号限行”法律规制研究
发布时间：2019-01-19 15:10
【摘要】：面对日渐繁荣的物质文化生活,汽车拥堵问题已经成为当下生活中的棘手问题。本文认为,机动车“尾号限行”这一措施的行使,使行政权对公民私权造成了一定侵害,然而作为短期内对缓解交通压力行之有效的行政手段,如何能通过行政法的角度对其加以完善,减少其争议增加其效用则是本文的研究重点。 本文首先对机动车“尾号限行”进行了综合概述,简单介绍了机动车“尾号限行”的相关概念、特征、法律性质,及其理论基础等基本知识；其次,本文通过从宏观上对机动车“尾号限行”的背景与现状加以描述,为下一章机动车“尾号限行”的法理分析埋下伏笔；第三章则从合法性、合理性、程序正当性三个角度深入研究,探究该措施的法理依据是否充分；第四章,通过完善相关的法律法规使其进一步合法化,构建利益补偿机制使其更加合理,健全正当法律程序使其更趋向于公平、公正。从而,使机动车“尾号限行”这一措施的争议减少,能被更多的民众所理解,更有效地缓解行人、道路、机动车之间的矛盾,促进社会和谐。
[Abstract]:In the face of the increasingly prosperous material and cultural life, the problem of car congestion has become a thorny problem in current life. This paper holds that the exercise of the measure of "tail number restriction" of motor vehicle causes certain infringement of administrative power to citizens' private rights, however, it is an effective administrative means to alleviate traffic pressure in the short term. How to perfect it through the angle of administrative law and reduce its controversy and increase its utility is the focus of this paper. At first, this paper gives a comprehensive overview of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle, and introduces the basic knowledge of the vehicle "tail number limit", such as the concept, characteristics, legal nature, and theoretical basis of the vehicle's "tail number limit". Secondly, this paper describes the background and current situation of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle from the macro perspective, and lays the groundwork for the next chapter of the legal theory analysis of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle. The third chapter is from the legitimacy, rationality, procedural legitimacy of three in-depth research, to explore the legal basis of the measure is adequate; The fourth chapter, by perfecting the relevant laws and regulations to further legalize it, construct the benefit compensation mechanism to make it more reasonable, and perfect the due process of law to make it more fair and just. As a result, the dispute on the measure of "tail limit" of motor vehicle can be reduced, which can be understood by more people, alleviate the contradiction among pedestrians, roads and motor vehicles more effectively, and promote social harmony.
【学位授予单位】：长春理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14
本文编号：2411486
[Abstract]:In the face of the increasingly prosperous material and cultural life, the problem of car congestion has become a thorny problem in current life. This paper holds that the exercise of the measure of "tail number restriction" of motor vehicle causes certain infringement of administrative power to citizens' private rights, however, it is an effective administrative means to alleviate traffic pressure in the short term. How to perfect it through the angle of administrative law and reduce its controversy and increase its utility is the focus of this paper. At first, this paper gives a comprehensive overview of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle, and introduces the basic knowledge of the vehicle "tail number limit", such as the concept, characteristics, legal nature, and theoretical basis of the vehicle's "tail number limit". Secondly, this paper describes the background and current situation of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle from the macro perspective, and lays the groundwork for the next chapter of the legal theory analysis of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle. The third chapter is from the legitimacy, rationality, procedural legitimacy of three in-depth research, to explore the legal basis of the measure is adequate; The fourth chapter, by perfecting the relevant laws and regulations to further legalize it, construct the benefit compensation mechanism to make it more reasonable, and perfect the due process of law to make it more fair and just. As a result, the dispute on the measure of "tail limit" of motor vehicle can be reduced, which can be understood by more people, alleviate the contradiction among pedestrians, roads and motor vehicles more effectively, and promote social harmony.
【学位授予单位】：长春理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵先立;;缓解大型城市交通拥堵的国际经验和我国的解决对策[J];城市观察;2012年03期
2 胡建淼;张效羽;;有关对物权行政限制的几个法律问题——以全国部分城市小车尾号限行为例[J];法学;2011年11期
3 刘伟;;行政法视野下行政决策的正当性分析——以北京、杭州、成都三地汽车限行为例[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2013年02期
4 郑新骏;;价格听证中的公众参与[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年02期
5 俞佳飞;;从机动车限行实践看效果和风险[J];交通与运输(学术版);2011年01期
6 刘小明;;北京市低碳交通体系发展战略[J];建设科技;2010年17期
7 张鲁萍;;试论行政强制的有效实施——以《行政强制法》的反思为视角[J];江汉大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
8 张微林;;风险治理过程中的法律规制模式转型[J];科技与法律;2012年06期
9 杨治坤;;部门行政职权相对集中的宪政基础[J];广西社会科学;2013年04期
10 陈永强;;社会公共利益原则的合同法适用[J];杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
，本文编号：2411486
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2411486.html
