国有土地上房屋征收强制执行制度研究
发布时间：2019-03-15 11:17
【摘要】：随着我国城市化进程速度的加快，我国国有土地上房屋征收强制执行的问题却越来越突出，虽然法律法规进行了一系列改进，但是暴力事件却屡屡频发，没有达到法律法规预想的结果。我国房屋征收强制执行制度存在诸多的问题，如执行主体不统一，责任划定的不明确，相关救济途径不畅通等等，这些都导致了人们对政府及有关行政权的不信任，另外由于我国人民法院独立性不强，司法资源不足，作为房屋征收强制执行主体会影响房屋征收强制执行的进行，加重了司法机关的责任，且不利于司法权的行使。 基于以上的原因、问题以及对域外相关制度的考察，本文对现有的房屋征收强制执行制度进行了完善，提出了实行裁定和执行相分离的模式，并且对执行前的司法审查、执行中的监督机制、执行中各方责任以及被执行人的救济等方面进行了完善，确保既实现了行政目的又保护了被执行人的权利，既防止了行政权的滥用，又树立了人们对行政权的信任，更减轻了法院的工作力度。 本文在第一部分简单介绍了我国国有土地上房屋征收强制执行的相关理论及概念，主要研究了房屋征收的历史发展以及我国对国有土地上的房屋征收强制执行的界定，是全文的一个基础。然后梳理了我国国有土地上房屋征收强制执行模式的历史发展，是下文中有关执行模式论证的历史前提。本文第二章对其制度所存在的问题进行的一一论述，主要论述了司法强拆实践瓶颈的原因以及有关职责的分配、执行的监督、责任的认定以及被执行人的救济等方面存在的问题，，而后文的制度完善也是以这些问题为基础进行的改进。第三章考察了域外相关制度的规定，并且进行了一个概括式的总结，分别针对不同点和相同点进行了分析，虽然我国跟一些国家的规定不大相同，但域外国家的土地征用制度对我国的相关制度具有相当多的参考意义，这为后文的制度完善提供了一些域外的借鉴。最后一章是全文的重点，主要是针对存在的问题，参考域外相关制度的规定，提出了一些制度完善的建议，构建出了裁执分离的模式，并提出了增加独立第三方作为执行主体的补充，扩大司法审查范围，增加告诫制度以及执行终止制度等等，以期让我国国有土地上房屋征收强制执行制度更加完善。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of urbanization in China, the enforcement of housing expropriation on state-owned land has become more and more prominent. Although a series of laws and regulations have been improved, however, violence has frequently occurred. Failed to achieve the expected results of the laws and regulations. There are many problems in the enforcement system of house expropriation in our country, such as the inconsistency of the subject of execution, the unclear delineation of responsibility, the lack of relevant relief channels and so on, which have led to people's mistrust of the government and the relevant administrative power. In addition, because the independence of the people's court of our country is not strong and the judicial resources are insufficient, as the subject of house expropriation enforcement, it will affect the enforcement of house expropriation, aggravate the responsibility of the judicial organ, and not conducive to the exercise of judicial power. Based on the above reasons, problems and the investigation of the relevant extraterritorial system, this paper has improved the existing house expropriation enforcement system, put forward the mode of separation between adjudication and enforcement, and the judicial review before execution, The supervision mechanism in the execution, the responsibility of the parties in the execution and the relief of the executed person have been perfected to ensure that the administrative purpose is realized and the rights of the executed person are protected, and the abuse of the executive power is prevented. It also established people's trust in the executive power and reduced the strength of the court's work. In the first part, this paper briefly introduces the relevant theories and concepts of house expropriation enforcement on state-owned land, mainly studies the historical development of house expropriation and the definition of enforcement of house expropriation on state-owned land in our country. Is a foundation of the full text. Then it combs the historical development of the enforcement mode of house expropriation on the state-owned land, which is the historical premise of the demonstration of the enforcement mode. The second chapter of this paper discusses the problems existing in its system, mainly discusses the reasons for the bottleneck of judicial demolition practice, the distribution of related duties, and the supervision of execution. The cognizance of the responsibility and the relief of the executed person exist some problems, and the improvement of the system is based on these problems. The third chapter examines the provisions of the relevant extraterritorial system, and makes a general summary, respectively, for the analysis of different points and similarities, although the provisions of our country and some countries are not the same. However, the land expropriation system of the extraterritorial countries has a lot of reference significance to the related system of our country, which provides some extraterritorial reference for the perfection of the system. The last chapter is the focus of the full text, mainly aimed at the existing problems, referring to the provisions of the relevant system outside the territory, put forward some suggestions to improve the system, and set up a model of separation of adjudicators. In order to improve the enforcement system of house expropriation on state-owned land, it is proposed to increase the supplement of independent third party as the main body of execution, expand the scope of judicial review, add the system of admonition and the system of termination of execution, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.33
本文编号：2440577
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of urbanization in China, the enforcement of housing expropriation on state-owned land has become more and more prominent. Although a series of laws and regulations have been improved, however, violence has frequently occurred. Failed to achieve the expected results of the laws and regulations. There are many problems in the enforcement system of house expropriation in our country, such as the inconsistency of the subject of execution, the unclear delineation of responsibility, the lack of relevant relief channels and so on, which have led to people's mistrust of the government and the relevant administrative power. In addition, because the independence of the people's court of our country is not strong and the judicial resources are insufficient, as the subject of house expropriation enforcement, it will affect the enforcement of house expropriation, aggravate the responsibility of the judicial organ, and not conducive to the exercise of judicial power. Based on the above reasons, problems and the investigation of the relevant extraterritorial system, this paper has improved the existing house expropriation enforcement system, put forward the mode of separation between adjudication and enforcement, and the judicial review before execution, The supervision mechanism in the execution, the responsibility of the parties in the execution and the relief of the executed person have been perfected to ensure that the administrative purpose is realized and the rights of the executed person are protected, and the abuse of the executive power is prevented. It also established people's trust in the executive power and reduced the strength of the court's work. In the first part, this paper briefly introduces the relevant theories and concepts of house expropriation enforcement on state-owned land, mainly studies the historical development of house expropriation and the definition of enforcement of house expropriation on state-owned land in our country. Is a foundation of the full text. Then it combs the historical development of the enforcement mode of house expropriation on the state-owned land, which is the historical premise of the demonstration of the enforcement mode. The second chapter of this paper discusses the problems existing in its system, mainly discusses the reasons for the bottleneck of judicial demolition practice, the distribution of related duties, and the supervision of execution. The cognizance of the responsibility and the relief of the executed person exist some problems, and the improvement of the system is based on these problems. The third chapter examines the provisions of the relevant extraterritorial system, and makes a general summary, respectively, for the analysis of different points and similarities, although the provisions of our country and some countries are not the same. However, the land expropriation system of the extraterritorial countries has a lot of reference significance to the related system of our country, which provides some extraterritorial reference for the perfection of the system. The last chapter is the focus of the full text, mainly aimed at the existing problems, referring to the provisions of the relevant system outside the territory, put forward some suggestions to improve the system, and set up a model of separation of adjudicators. In order to improve the enforcement system of house expropriation on state-owned land, it is proposed to increase the supplement of independent third party as the main body of execution, expand the scope of judicial review, add the system of admonition and the system of termination of execution, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.33
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭小霞;;我国司法强拆制度之困境研究——以被拆迁人权利保护为视角[J];长白学刊;2011年05期
2 姜明安;;认真对待公民权利——写在《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》颁布之时[J];党政干部参考;2011年03期
3 王达;拆迁行政案件审理中的八个实体问题[J];法律适用;2005年05期
4 杨建顺;;司法裁判、裁执分离与征收补偿——《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》的权力博弈论[J];法律适用;2011年06期
5 朱芒;;日本房屋征收制度的基本状况[J];法学;2007年08期
6 唐杰英;;“司法强拆”可否走出征收困局[J];法学;2012年04期
7 王达;;试论国有土地上房屋征收参与人[J];中国房地产;2011年11期
8 孙英哲;;“司法强拆”取代“行政强拆”之后——《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》第28条的得失之辩[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年01期
9 王达;;房屋征收司法强制执行的种类、依据和程序[J];中国房地产;2012年11期
10 王达;;规范征收执行之制度保障——最高人民法院《关于办理申请人民法院强制执行国有土地上房屋征收补偿决定案件若干问题的规定》解读[J];中国房地产;2012年09期
本文编号：2440577
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2440577.html
