地方立法主体扩容改革的立法需求悖论及其破解
发布时间：2019-03-18 18:36
【摘要】：设区的市的立法需求既是地方立法主体扩容改革的动因,对需求的回应也是此后科学立法、民主立法的基本要求之一。但《立法法》修改后的各地实践却显示出与此改革逻辑相悖的情况,立法需求并未在制度运行中彰显出预设的规范地位,各设区的市出现找不到需求或制定出来的立法没有回应需求的现象。这一改革悖论既源于《立法法》中"立法需求"概念的内涵与外延不明,也源于作为新手的地市级立法主体尚未建立一种需求回应型的价值取向,各地正在建构的立法程序也没有形成如何搜寻、甄别并回应立法需求的规范建构。其破解路径在于剖析立法需求的概念内涵与呈现于地市级立法活动之中的外延,将其安置于过往"问题—立法—解决问题"的简单化思维之中,重新形成一种需求回应型的立法思维,并通过立法程序设计,赋予立法需求在地市级立法制度中的应然地位。
[Abstract]:The legislative demand of the divided city is not only the cause of the expansion of the local legislative body, but also one of the basic requirements of the scientific legislation and democratic legislation. However, the revised practice of the Legislative Law shows that it is contrary to the logic of this reform, and the legislative needs have not shown a presupposed normative position in the operation of the system. Cities in each district have no demand or legislation that does not respond to demand. This paradox of reform stems not only from the unclear connotation and extension of the concept of "legislative demand" in the Legislative Law, but also from the fact that the prefectural and municipal legislative subject, as a novice, has not yet established a demand-responsive value orientation. The legislative process under construction has not formed the normative construction of how to search, screen and respond to the legislative needs. The way to solve the problem lies in analyzing the concept connotation of legislative demand and the extension presented in the legislative activities at the municipal level, and placing it in the simplified thinking of "problem-legislation-solving problem" in the past. It reforms a kind of legislative thinking of demand response, and through the legislative procedure design, endows the legislative demand with the proper status in the city-level legislative system.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【基金】：中山大学高校基本业务费“地方立法权属扩容背景下广东立法实证研究”(17wkpy10)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D927
本文编号：2443123
[Abstract]:The legislative demand of the divided city is not only the cause of the expansion of the local legislative body, but also one of the basic requirements of the scientific legislation and democratic legislation. However, the revised practice of the Legislative Law shows that it is contrary to the logic of this reform, and the legislative needs have not shown a presupposed normative position in the operation of the system. Cities in each district have no demand or legislation that does not respond to demand. This paradox of reform stems not only from the unclear connotation and extension of the concept of "legislative demand" in the Legislative Law, but also from the fact that the prefectural and municipal legislative subject, as a novice, has not yet established a demand-responsive value orientation. The legislative process under construction has not formed the normative construction of how to search, screen and respond to the legislative needs. The way to solve the problem lies in analyzing the concept connotation of legislative demand and the extension presented in the legislative activities at the municipal level, and placing it in the simplified thinking of "problem-legislation-solving problem" in the past. It reforms a kind of legislative thinking of demand response, and through the legislative procedure design, endows the legislative demand with the proper status in the city-level legislative system.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【基金】：中山大学高校基本业务费“地方立法权属扩容背景下广东立法实证研究”(17wkpy10)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D927
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 谢素芳;;成都:民主立法的坚守与创新[J];中国人大;2012年19期
2 徐平;郑清贤;;关于平潭综合实验区立法主体的思考[J];海峡法学;2013年02期
3 鲍志宏;;我国体育产业法律若干问题的思考[J];商场现代化;2006年23期
4 姜楠;;中美政府信息公开范围及方式比较[J];经营管理者;2012年19期
5 吴克泽;;民族区域自治法配套立法主体刍议[J];宁夏社会科学;2011年06期
6 崔璨;;我国文物立法存在的问题及反思[J];湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
7 赵新龙;;我国农村低保的地方样态及其经验——以80个地方立法主体为样本[J];现代经济探讨;2014年07期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 本报特约评论员 胡健;重视区域立法协调的法治价值[N];法制日报;2006年
2 单士兵;立法招标：民主立法的尝试性开端[N];工人日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 姚澍峥;地方立法主体扩容问题研究[D];山东大学;2017年
，本文编号：2443123
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2443123.html
