农村宅基地置换中农民权益的法律保障
发布时间：2019-04-11 21:10
【摘要】：宅基地置换是近年来政府在农村土地领域推行的重要政策。作为土地整理的一种模式,在国家城乡建设用地增减挂钩的指引下,对我国的城镇化建设和城乡一体化产生了巨大的作用。但是在宅基地置换中,因为相关制度的不完善,农民地位的弱势,导致农民作为宅基地使用权人和房屋所有权人,在宅基地置换中的权益受到了大量侵害。政府因其在宅基地置换中的双重身份,自我收益最大化等性质,经常出现侵犯农民权益的现象,由此引发的社会矛盾已经严重影响社会的和谐稳定。因此,对现有宅基地置换政策和实践的梳理分析,对宅基地置换中农民权益受损因素的梳理分析,并寻求宅基地置换中农民权益保护之方法,具有非常重要的理论和现实意义。本文除引言和结语外,内容具体分为以下三部分:第一部分,农村宅基地置换政策的基本现状。首先介绍宅基地置换的概念和现实意义,其次梳理宅基地置换政策出台的历史沿革和背景,再次分别归纳国内三个典型——天津市、嘉兴市、重庆市的宅基地置换办法。第二部分,农村宅基地置换中农民法定权利与实现状况。首先分析农民在宅基地置换中的法定权利,分为实体权利、程序权利。实体权利有宅基地使用权、房屋所有权等等,程序权利有参与权、监督权、救济权等。其次从实践上分析农民有哪些实体权利和程序权利受到了侵害,并深入分析问题产生的原因。如实体权利中宅基地被置换为国有,农民土地权益受损、利益分配和补偿不合理等,程序权利方面,分别分析了参与权、监督权、救济权未获得制度保障。第三部分,农村宅基地置换中农民权益保障的法律建议。首先讲述了以程序救济实现实体救济,以程序正义保障实体正义的基本法理。其次从保障程序正义的角度,提出法律建议,分成三部分,农民参与权的法律保障,农民监督权的法律保障,农民救济权的法律保障,分别提出对策建议。最后提出立法上的建议。
[Abstract]:Homestead replacement is an important policy carried out by the government in the field of rural land in recent years. As a mode of land consolidation, under the guidance of the increase and decrease of the country's urban and rural construction land, it has played a great role in the urbanization construction and the integration of urban and rural areas in our country. However, due to the imperfection of the relevant system and the weakness of farmers' status, the rights and interests of farmers, as homestead owners and homeowners, have been infringed on in the process of homestead replacement. Because of its dual identity in homestead replacement and self-profit maximization, the government often infringes farmers' rights and interests. The social contradiction caused by this phenomenon has seriously affected the harmony and stability of the society. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to sort out and analyze the existing policies and practices of homestead replacement, to analyze the factors affecting farmers' rights and interests, and to seek the methods of protecting farmers' rights and interests in homestead replacement. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the content is divided into the following three parts: the first part, the basic status of rural homestead replacement policy. Firstly, the concept and practical significance of homestead replacement are introduced. Secondly, the historical evolution and background of the introduction of homestead replacement policy are combed, and then the homestead replacement methods of Tianjin, Jiaxing and Chongqing are summarized respectively. The second part, the farmer's legal right and the realization condition in the rural homestead replacement. First of all, the legal rights of farmers in the replacement of homestead are divided into substantive rights and procedural rights. Substantive rights have the right to use the homestead, ownership of the house, etc., procedural rights have the right to participate, supervision, relief and so on. Secondly, from the practical point of view, which substantive rights and procedural rights of farmers have been infringed, and in-depth analysis of the causes of the problems. If the homestead is replaced as state-owned in the substantive right, farmers' land rights and interests are damaged, the benefit distribution and compensation are unreasonable and so on. In the aspect of procedural rights, the participation right, supervision right and relief right are not guaranteed by the system respectively. The third part, rural homestead replacement in the protection of farmers' rights and interests of the legal recommendations. Firstly, the basic legal principle of realizing substantive relief by procedural relief and guaranteeing substantive justice by procedural justice is described. Secondly, from the angle of guaranteeing procedural justice, it puts forward legal suggestions, which are divided into three parts: the legal guarantee of farmers' right to participate, the legal guarantee of peasants' right of supervision, the legal guarantee of peasants' right to relief, and the countermeasures and suggestions respectively. Finally, some suggestions on legislation are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.32
本文编号：2456747
[Abstract]:Homestead replacement is an important policy carried out by the government in the field of rural land in recent years. As a mode of land consolidation, under the guidance of the increase and decrease of the country's urban and rural construction land, it has played a great role in the urbanization construction and the integration of urban and rural areas in our country. However, due to the imperfection of the relevant system and the weakness of farmers' status, the rights and interests of farmers, as homestead owners and homeowners, have been infringed on in the process of homestead replacement. Because of its dual identity in homestead replacement and self-profit maximization, the government often infringes farmers' rights and interests. The social contradiction caused by this phenomenon has seriously affected the harmony and stability of the society. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to sort out and analyze the existing policies and practices of homestead replacement, to analyze the factors affecting farmers' rights and interests, and to seek the methods of protecting farmers' rights and interests in homestead replacement. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the content is divided into the following three parts: the first part, the basic status of rural homestead replacement policy. Firstly, the concept and practical significance of homestead replacement are introduced. Secondly, the historical evolution and background of the introduction of homestead replacement policy are combed, and then the homestead replacement methods of Tianjin, Jiaxing and Chongqing are summarized respectively. The second part, the farmer's legal right and the realization condition in the rural homestead replacement. First of all, the legal rights of farmers in the replacement of homestead are divided into substantive rights and procedural rights. Substantive rights have the right to use the homestead, ownership of the house, etc., procedural rights have the right to participate, supervision, relief and so on. Secondly, from the practical point of view, which substantive rights and procedural rights of farmers have been infringed, and in-depth analysis of the causes of the problems. If the homestead is replaced as state-owned in the substantive right, farmers' land rights and interests are damaged, the benefit distribution and compensation are unreasonable and so on. In the aspect of procedural rights, the participation right, supervision right and relief right are not guaranteed by the system respectively. The third part, rural homestead replacement in the protection of farmers' rights and interests of the legal recommendations. Firstly, the basic legal principle of realizing substantive relief by procedural relief and guaranteeing substantive justice by procedural justice is described. Secondly, from the angle of guaranteeing procedural justice, it puts forward legal suggestions, which are divided into three parts: the legal guarantee of farmers' right to participate, the legal guarantee of peasants' right of supervision, the legal guarantee of peasants' right to relief, and the countermeasures and suggestions respectively. Finally, some suggestions on legislation are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.32
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何跃军;周婕;杨淑琴;;新兴行业行政规制的正当性与界限——基于打车软件行业的现实主义观察[J];宁波大学学报(人文科学版);2016年06期
2 李鹏举;陈利根;;宅基地置换中农民参与权问题研究[J];农业科学研究;2015年02期
3 吴倩;;我国现行宅基地置换模式下存在问题研究[J];中国管理信息化;2015年12期
4 喻文莉;张睿;;宅基地置换中农民土地权益保护问题探究——以浙江省为例[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年01期
5 吴远来;梅雨;;宅基地置换实践中政府行为偏差分析[J];农业经济问题;2014年11期
6 冯双生;张桂文;;宅基地置换中农民权益受损问题及对策研究[J];农业经济问题;2013年12期
7 何跃军;;略论基层政府维稳中的公众参与——基于风险社会学的考察[J];法学评论;2013年04期
8 易舟;段建南;;农村闲置宅基地整理参与主体利益博弈分析[J];农业科技管理;2013年02期
9 朱玫瑛;;宅基地置换改革反思及其启示——以浙江省海盐县为例[J];经济师;2013年03期
10 张远索;谢文阳;张占录;;我国“宅基地换房”利益主体博弈分析[J];经济与管理;2013年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 冯双生;我国农村宅基地置换中农民权益保护问题研究[D];辽宁大学;2013年
2 杨昊;农地流转的法经济学分析[D];山西财经大学;2010年
，本文编号：2456747
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2456747.html
