商标法在先权利保护原则适用研究

发布时间：2018-01-12 03:23

本文关键词：商标法在先权利保护原则适用研究　出处：《华南理工大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着经济全球化的不断深入,人们保护知识产权的意识日益增强。在商标领域,商标蕴含的巨大商业价值越来越受到重视。近年来,商标抢注、“搭便车”的案件屡受热议,例如“乔丹”、“IVERSON”、“林书豪”等名人姓名被抢注为商标,未经同意将他人的百年老字号注册为商标,将他人的字画注册为商标等案件,体现的都是商标权与在先权利的冲突问题。要解决这些纠纷,需要考量哪些因素和依据何种原则,才能更好地平衡保护商标权和在先权利,这是值得思量的问题。我国《商标法》对在先权利的保护作了概括性的规定,确定了“保护在先权利原则”,但是并未对在先权利的概念、范围做出明确规定,也并未明确在先权利的认定标准,更没有设置冲突解决原则的适用规则。实务中权利冲突的形式呈现多样化与复杂化,加上立法的缺陷,实践中对保护在先权利原则的理解和适用往往标准不一,导致出现法院裁判和商评委裁定相悖的情况。如何合理平衡商标权人与在先权利人的合法权益,正确理解适用保护在先权利原则,有效防范和解决商标权和在先权利的冲突,已成为商标领域最具必要性与现实性的焦点问题。解决商标权与在先权利的纠纷,需明确我国商标法保护的在先权利范围,理清商标权侵犯在先权利的具体侵权判定标准,合理适用商标权与在先权利冲突解决原则。明确双方互负的权利义务,衡平保护合法在先权利人和商标权人的权益,达到最优效能,公平合理的解决纠纷。可以从立法和司法层面完善在先权利保护制度,例如,在立法上,设立知识产权共存制度和强制许可制度,尽快确立商品化权,在司法实务中,秉承尊重“保护在先权利原则”的基础上,结合适用公平效益和权利失效等原则,平衡保护和实现商标权人和在先权利人的合法权利,实现双赢。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of economic globalization, people are increasingly aware of the protection of intellectual property rights. In the field of trademark, the huge commercial value of trademark has been paid more and more attention. In recent years, trademark grabs. The "free ride" case has been hotly discussed, such as "Jordan", "IVERSON", "Lin Jeremy" and other celebrity names have been stolen as trademarks, without consent to others' century-old brand registration as a trademark. Registration of other people's paintings as trademarks and other cases reflect the conflict between trademark rights and prior rights. In order to resolve these disputes we need to consider what factors and principles. Only in order to better balance the protection of trademark rights and prior rights, this is worth considering. Our country's Trademark Law makes general provisions on the protection of prior rights, and determines the "principle of the protection of prior rights". However, there is no clear definition of the concept and scope of the prior right, nor is it clear about the criteria for the determination of the prior right. Moreover, there are no applicable rules of conflict resolution principle. In practice, the forms of conflict of rights present diversity and complexity, coupled with the defects of legislation, the understanding and application of the principle of protection of prior rights are often different in practice. Leading to the court and the judge ruling contrary to the situation. How to balance the legitimate rights and interests of the trademark owner and the prior right holder, and correctly understand the application of the principle of protection of prior rights. To effectively prevent and resolve the conflicts between trademark rights and prior rights has become the most necessary and realistic focus in the field of trademark, and to resolve the disputes between trademark rights and prior rights. It is necessary to clarify the scope of the prior rights protected by the trademark law of our country, clarify the specific criteria for judging the infringement of the prior rights, apply the principle of resolving the conflict between the trademark rights and the prior rights, and clarify the mutual rights and obligations of both sides. Balancing the protection of the rights and interests of the legal prior right holder and the trademark owner to achieve the optimal efficiency and fair and reasonable settlement of disputes. We can improve the prior rights protection system from the legislative and judicial levels, for example, in legislation. Establish the system of coexistence of intellectual property rights and compulsory licensing system, establish the right of commercialization as soon as possible. In judicial practice, on the basis of respecting the principle of "protecting prior rights", combining with the application of the principles of fair benefit and invalidation of rights, etc. Balance the protection and realization of the legal rights of the trademark owner and the prior right holder, and achieve a win-win situation.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】