专利拒绝许可的反垄断规制

发布时间：2018-01-21 04:04

本文关键词： 专利拒绝许可反垄断关键设施专利池　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着中国经济的发展，知识产权在经济总量中的影响越来越大，知识产权相关的法律问题也凸显出来。“德先案”、“DVD案”和“华为案”都涉及知识产权滥用的法律问题，尤其与专利拒绝许可的反垄断规制相关。中国市场企业面临此类事件时，要么没有合适的相关法律来保护自己，要么是相关法律过于原则导致无法给出明晰的指引，比如“德先案”涉及的infolithium技术是否构成原告进入相关市场所必需设施，被告拒绝许可是否构成垄断行为；“DVD案”专利池拒绝许可的合法性判断；“华为案”拒绝许可的成立与否，拒绝许可的判断标准等。相关法律缺少规定或模糊的回应都反映我国的知识产权反垄断规制的立法缺陷。本文先导出当前专利拒绝许可反垄断的相关事件，分析指出我国专利拒绝许可反垄断规制在立法上的缺陷，然后从利益平衡和权利不得滥用的法理分析专利拒绝许可反垄断的必要性，介绍探析欧美的立法和实例以及专利拒绝许可反垄断的比较分析，最后结合我国的实际，提出了相应的建议。第一章专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的立法缺陷。首先导出专利拒绝许可的“德先案”、“DVD案”和“华为案”事件，分别就上述案件提出我国专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的法律问题，然后对目前我国专利许可反垄断规制的立法规定做梳理，最后指出我国专利拒绝许可反垄断规制立法的不足，重点指出关键设施规则、专利池拒绝许可判断原则和专利单方拒绝许可判断标准的缺失。第二章专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的法理分析。该章首先从专利权、合同自由与反垄断的一般理解，分析专利权的垄断性和行使、合同自由和限制以及反垄断法的价值和适用的视角探析专利权行使过程中静态和动态关系，，指出专利权滥用的可能性，然后分析专利拒绝许可的反垄断规制的法理依据，从专利制度本身具有利益平衡性质和知识产权滥用的反垄断规制说明利益平衡理论；从自由是相对的和反垄断法规制的是垄断行为而不是权利本身分析了权利不得滥用理论。第三章欧美专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的分析。首先分别介绍了美国欧盟专利拒绝许可的反垄断规制的立法情况，介绍和简要分析了美国和欧盟的专利拒绝许可的案例和反垄断规制的思路；然后从相关市场、市场支配地位和关键设施三个要素比较分析欧美专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的规则，最后介绍了专利池拒绝许可的分析方法。第四章完善专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的法律建议。首先指出制定知识产权反垄断指南的需要解决的问题，即结合中国市场实际和排除部门利益，然后提出就专利拒绝许可反垄断规制的具体法律建议，以及建议统一执法部门。
[Abstract]:With the development of Chinese economy, intellectual property has more and more influence in the total economic volume, and the legal problems related to intellectual property are also highlighted. Both the DVD case and the Huawei case deal with legal issues related to intellectual property abuse, especially in relation to antitrust regulations that deny licensing for patents. Chinese market companies face such incidents. Either there is no appropriate relevant law to protect themselves, or the relevant laws are too principled to give clear guidance. For example, whether the infolithium technology involved in the "Desen case" constitutes the necessary facilities for the plaintiff to enter the relevant market, and whether the defendant's refusal of permission constitutes a monopoly act; The legitimacy judgment of the patent pool refusing permission in "DVD case"; "Huawei case" denied the establishment or not. The judgment standard of refusing license and so on. The lack of regulation or vague response of relevant laws reflect the legislative defects of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property in China. The author points out the defects in the legislation of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license in China, and then analyzes the necessity of patent refusal to license antitrust from the legal principle of balance of interests and right not to be abused. This paper introduces the legislation and examples of Europe and the United States, and the comparative analysis of the anti-monopoly of patent refusal license. Finally, combined with the reality of our country, the corresponding suggestions are put forward. The first chapter is about the legislative defects of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license. Firstly, the "Deson case", "DVD case" and "Huawei case" of patent refusal license are derived. On the above mentioned cases, the author puts forward the legal issues of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license in China, and then combs the legislative provisions of anti-monopoly regulation of patent license in China. Finally, it points out the deficiency of the legislation of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license in our country, and points out the key facility rules, the judgment principle of patent pool refusal license and the lack of judgment standard of patent unilateral refusal license. The second chapter is the legal analysis of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license. Firstly, this chapter analyzes the monopoly and exercise of patent right from the general understanding of patent right, freedom of contract and anti-monopoly. From the perspective of freedom and limitation of contract and the value and application of anti-monopoly law, the paper analyzes the static and dynamic relationship in the process of patent right exercise, and points out the possibility of patent abuse. Then it analyzes the legal basis of the anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license and explains the theory of interest balance from the nature of the patent system itself and the abuse of intellectual property rights. This paper analyzes the theory of non-abuse of right from the view that freedom is relative and antimonopoly law regulates monopoly behavior rather than right itself. The third chapter analyzes the anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license in Europe and the United States. Firstly, it introduces the legislation of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license in the United States and the European Union. This paper introduces and briefly analyzes the cases of patent refusal and antitrust regulation in the United States and the European Union. Then the rules of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license in Europe and the United States are compared and analyzed from the relevant market, market dominant position and key facilities. Finally, the analysis method of patent pool refusing license is introduced. Chapter 4th perfect the legal suggestion of anti-monopoly regulation of patent refusal license. First of all, it points out the problems that need to be solved in formulating anti-monopoly guide of intellectual property, that is, combining the reality of Chinese market and excluding the interests of departments. Then it puts forward some specific legal suggestions on the regulation of patent refusal license, and proposes to unify the law enforcement department.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】