SaaS模式下著作权问题探析

发布时间：2018-02-04 15:29

本文关键词： 云计算 SaaS 信息网络传播权复制权出租权著作权保护　出处：《北京邮电大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：著作权制度的更新、完善源于科技的进步,科技的发展推动着著作权相关立法的前行。未来的时代是“云计算”的时代,而云计算既不是对著作权保护的第一次挑战,也不会是最后一次。随着“云计算”相关技术的成熟和推广,其已经逐渐成为当前与未来个人、公司或是单位信息处理的主要方式,而基于元计算所产生的新的运营模式,则对既有的著作权法体系形成了极大挑战。以下三种服务模式都是云计算的主要模式：即IaaS模式、PaaS模式和SaaS模式。其中,IaaS所指的模式为基础架构即服务；PaaS所指的模式为即服务；SaaS所指的模式为软件即服务。随着信息科技的发展,作为一种新型的软件应用类型,SaaS(软件即服务)不同于传统的实体销售模式,而是转变为一种具有租赁性质的软件运营模式,将所需要的软件置于其云端服务器,并有偿地提供给用户“临时使用”,同一套软件将可以同时出租给多个租户使用,这种模式的转变对软件的著作权保护提出了更高的要求。在"SaaS(软件即服务)”模式下,云服务提供者作为特定软件作品的提供者,当其向用户提供相关作品时,如果该作品属于未经授权而加以利用的情形,该类行为可为著作权人的何种专有权所控制?这些都是需要探究的问题。现行著作权制度中的专有权利在规制SaaS模式下提供软件和服务存在适用困境的问题,需要进一步探讨扩展。笔者通过分析,考虑到SaaS软件使用行为符合出租权核心构成要件,对出租权制度进行适度扩张解释不仅满足其自身内涵,同时也契合出租权的支配性效力。认为SaaS模式下提供软件服务具备适用出租权的可行性,但需要对传统著作权中规定的出租权进行扩张解释。云服务商加强服务系统的保护能在一定程度上平衡公共利益与知识产权。如果利益不够平衡,则可能会引发公众的抵制情绪,同时也不利于云计算相关产业的发展,最终损害更多人的利益。
[Abstract]:The renewal and perfection of copyright system originates from the progress of science and technology. The development of science and technology promotes the progress of copyright legislation. The future era is the era of "cloud computing". Cloud computing is neither the first challenge to copyright protection nor the last. With the maturity and promotion of cloud computing related technologies, cloud computing has gradually become the current and future individuals. The main way in which companies or units process information, and based on the new business model generated by meta-computing. The following three service models are the main models of cloud computing: IaaS model PaaS model and SaaS model. IaaS refers to a pattern of infrastructure as a service; PaaS refers to the mode as a service; SaaS refers to a pattern of software as a service. With the development of information technology, SaaS (Software as a Service), as a new type of software application, is different from the traditional physical sales mode, but has changed into a kind of software operation mode with the nature of lease. By placing the required software on its cloud server and making it available for "temporary use" at a cost, the same set of software will be available for rental to multiple tenants at the same time. The transformation of this model puts forward higher requirements for the copyright protection of software. In the "SaaS (Software as a Service)" mode, cloud service providers are the providers of specific software works. When it provides the user with the relevant work, if the work is used without authorization, what kind of exclusive right can be controlled by the copyright owner? These are all questions that need to be explored. In the current copyright system, the exclusive rights of providing software and services under the regulation of SaaS mode are difficult to apply, which need to be further explored and expanded. Considering that the use of SaaS software conforms to the core elements of rental rights, the moderate expansion of the system of rental rights not only meets its own connotation. At the same time, it also accords with the dominating effect of the lease right. It is considered that the software service provided under the SaaS mode has the feasibility of applying the lease right, but it needs to expand and explain the rental right stipulated in the traditional copyright. Cloud service providers to strengthen the protection of service systems can to some extent balance the public interest and intellectual property rights. If the interests are not balanced, it may lead to public resistance. At the same time, it is not conducive to the development of cloud computing related industries, and ultimately harm the interests of more people.
【学位授予单位】：北京邮电大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】