我省驰名商标司法认定的调研报告

发布时间：2018-02-05 05:02

本文关键词： 驰名商标司法认定认定标准制度完善　出处：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：商标是一种重要的知识产权，代表了一种服务与产品的质量、信誉。经中华人民共和国国务院工商行政管理局商标局核准登记的商标为中华人民共和国注册商标。自然人、法人或者其他组织,对其生产、制造、加工、拣选或者经销的商品,提供的服务项目在中国境内需要与他人区别时，应当申请商标注册。 2001年7月，最高人民法院发布了《关于审理涉及计算机网络域名民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，第一次明确规定了人民法院审理域名纠纷案件，可以根据当事人的请求以及案件的具体情况，对涉及的注册商标是否驰名进行认定。从此，人民法院拥有了司法认定驰名商标的权力，，驰名商标认定模式由行政认定单轨制模式进入驰名商标行政认定和司法认定并存的双轨制模式。随着人民法院依法认定的驰名商标数量逐年递增，驰名商标司法认定已成为当前我国知识产权审判工作中的热点问题，驰名商标司法认定逐渐得到公众的认可。在驰名商标司法认定逐渐得到公众认可的今天，不可否认的是，人民法院对驰名商标认定的审判实践仍处于起步阶段，总体上的审判经验相对缺乏；关于认定驰名商标的具体法律规定原则性相对较强，操作性相对较弱，容易因此产生不同的认识；一些商标权利人也试图通过诉讼将其不具备驰名商标条件的商标变为驰名商标，以此作为其不正当扩大品牌知名度，打击排挤现实或潜在竞争对手的“捷径”。在驰名商标司法认定热潮中，出现了商业运作倾向、地方保护倾向、虚假诉讼倾向等扭曲倾向。因此，司法实践中，必须准确理解驰名商标的内涵，严格把握驰名商标的认定标准，避免不当认定驰名商标，确保驰名商标司法认定的严肃性和权威性。
[Abstract]:Trademark is an important intellectual property, representing the quality of a service and product. The trademark approved and registered by the Trademark Office of the State Council of the people's Republic of China shall be a registered trademark of the people's Republic of China. Natural persons, legal persons or other organizations shall produce, manufacture and process it. If the selected or distributed goods need to be distinguished from others within the territory of China, they shall apply for trademark registration. In July 2001, the Supreme people's Court issued an explanation on the legal issues applicable to the trial of civil disputes involving computer network domain names. For the first time clearly stipulated that the people's court tries the domain name dispute case, may according to the party's request as well as the specific situation of the case, carries on the confirmation to the involved registered trademark to be well-known. The people's court has the power of judicial recognition of well-known trademark, and the pattern of well-known trademark recognition has entered the two-track system of administrative recognition and judicial recognition from the mode of administrative recognition monorail system. With the increasing number of well-known trademarks recognized by the people's courts according to law, judicial recognition of well-known trademarks has become a hot issue in intellectual property trials in our country. The judicial cognizance of well-known trademark is gradually recognized by the public. Today, when the judicial cognizance of well-known trademark is gradually accepted by the public, it is undeniable that the trial practice of the people's court on the recognition of well-known trademark is still in its infancy. On the whole, the trial experience is relatively lacking; The specific legal provisions on the recognition of well-known trademarks are relatively strong in principle and relatively weak in maneuverability, so it is easy to produce different understandings; Some trademark owners also try to change the trademark which does not have the condition of well-known trademark into a well-known trademark through litigation, as its improper expansion of brand awareness. A "shortcut" against crowding out realistic or potential competitors. In the upsurge of judicial cognizance of well-known trademark, there are distorted tendencies such as commercial operation tendency, local protection tendency, false litigation tendency and so on. Therefore, in judicial practice, the connotation of well-known trademark must be accurately understood. Strictly grasp the standard of well-known trademark, avoid improper recognition of well-known trademark, ensure the seriousness and authority of judicial recognition of well-known trademark.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】