专利无效与专利侵权诉讼的协调机制研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 00:57

本文关键词： 专利无效宣告专利侵权诉讼专利无效抗辩现有技术抗辩　出处：《烟台大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着我国经济的发展和社会的进步,知识产权案件也越来越多。高效地处理知识产权纠纷是当事人的迫切心愿,也是法律工作者义不容辞的责任。在专利侵权诉讼中,被控侵权人往往向专利复审委员会请求宣告专利权无效,这就要在专利侵权诉讼程序之外走另外一个程序,即专利无效宣告程序。如何协调好这两个程序直接关系到案件的处理效率,是一个值得认真研究的问题。本文从专利无效宣告程序和侵权诉讼程序的关系出发,旨在探讨协调两个程序的方法。借鉴美国和日本的司法实践,结合我国情况,探讨适合我国的解决知识产权纠纷的方法。全文分为前言、正文、结语三个部分,正文共包括三章。第一章介绍专利无效宣告的基本情况,包括四个部分。第一部分介绍我国专利无效宣告程序,第二部分讲述该程序的特点,第三部分说明该程序存在的弊端,第四部分介绍几个知识产权大国的专利无效宣告程序。第二章说明专利无效抗辩制度的情况,主要从美国和日本的情况加以说明。探寻将其移植到中国的切入点。因为司法体制等原因,暂时尚且不能采纳美国赋予法院最终确认专利权效力的做法,但在专利权确权机制方面,我国可以借鉴日本的制度作为过渡措施。第三章主要论述协调专利无效宣告程序和侵权诉讼程序的几点建议,如专利无效抗辩、现有技术抗辩和中止侵权诉讼等。统一专利确权与专利侵权诉讼的判定标准,建立知识产权高等法院对专利确权和专利侵权案件做统一的上诉审理,这样两个程序的结果就因此而统一。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and society in our country, more and more intellectual property cases have been brought. It is the urgent wish of the parties to deal with intellectual property disputes efficiently, and it is also the duty of the legal workers. The alleged infringer often requests the Patent Reexamination Board to declare the patent right null and void, which requires that another procedure be taken in addition to the patent infringement proceedings. That is, patent invalidation procedure. How to coordinate these two procedures directly related to the processing efficiency of cases is a problem worthy of careful study. Starting from the relationship between patent invalidation procedure and tort procedure, this paper aims to discuss the methods of coordinating the two procedures. The author draws lessons from the judicial practice of the United States and Japan, and combines the situation of our country. This paper is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion, and the text includes three chapters. The first chapter introduces the basic situation of patent invalidation declaration, including four parts. The first part introduces the procedure of declaring patent invalidation in our country, the second part describes the characteristics of the procedure, the third part explains the disadvantages of the procedure. Part 4th introduces the patent invalidation procedure of several intellectual property countries. The second chapter explains the situation of patent invalidity defense system, mainly from the United States and Japan. Explore the point of entry to transplant it to China. Because of the judicial system and other reasons, It is not possible for the United States to grant the court the final confirmation of the validity of the patent right for the time being, but China can learn from the Japanese system as a transitional measure in the mechanism of patent right confirmation. The third chapter mainly discusses several suggestions to coordinate the procedure of patent invalidation declaration and infringement proceedings, such as patent invalidation defense, existing technology defense and suspension of infringement action, etc. The establishment of the High Court of intellectual property right to make a unified appeal against patent confirmation and patent infringement cases, so that the results of the two procedures are unified.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42;D925.1

【参考文献】