知识产权法与反垄断法上的市场

发布时间：2018-03-03 14:05

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：反垄断法　出处：《电子知识产权》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：反垄断案件和知识产权案件都需要在很多场合界定市场。但两个法律领域中的市场界定既有联系又有区别。市场结构因素在反垄断分析中具有基础地位,在知识产权案件中基本不具有相关性。知识产权法界定市场是为了确定企业间的对抗范围,反垄断法界定市场则是为了确定企业的市场势力。有些知识产权问题涉及竞争政策,但未必需要界定相关市场。还有一些涉及知识产权的案件,因损害竞争在实质上属于反垄断案件,需要按照反垄断法的分析方法处理,包括界定相关市场。在后一类案件中,知识产权因素导致市场界定需要做一些特殊考虑,但并不改变基本分析方法,尤其是知识产权的边界型排斥并不自动等同于垄断的市场型排斥;知识产权带来的产品差异化也不等同于垄断力量。
[Abstract]:Both antitrust cases and intellectual property cases need to define the market on many occasions. However, the definition of the market in the two legal fields is both related and different. The market structure factor has the basic position in the antitrust analysis. In intellectual property cases, there is little relevance. Intellectual property law defines markets to determine the scope of confrontation between enterprises, and antimonopoly laws define markets to determine the market power of enterprises. Some intellectual property issues involve competition policy. However, there may not necessarily be a need to define the relevant market... There are also cases involving intellectual property rights that, since the damage to competition is essentially an antitrust case, need to be dealt with in accordance with the analytical approach of anti-monopoly law, including the definition of the relevant market... in the latter category, Intellectual property factors lead to market definition needs to do some special consideration, but does not change the basic analysis method, especially the boundary exclusion of intellectual property does not automatically equate to monopoly market exclusion; The product differentiation brought by intellectual property is not equal to monopoly power.
【作者单位】：美国爱荷华大学;宾夕法尼亚大学法学院;宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院;华东政法大学知识产权学院;
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】