外观设计权利冲突问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-06 12:38

  本文选题:外观设计 切入点:专利权 出处:《华南理工大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:权利冲突是一个较普遍的法律现象,在知识产权领域,由于其客体的特殊性,更易产生权利冲突。随着我国司法实践的日益深化,知识产权领域的权利冲突问题引起了学者的广泛关注与积极探讨。 我国专利法对其保护的外观设计客体有美感要求,这就使其有了一定的独创性并倾注了创作者的思想,因而其中的一部分可能与著作权保护的客体作品重合或交叉;外观设计以形状、图案和色彩或其结合为设计要素,具有识别性的那一部分可能与商标法保护的客体商标重合或交叉;很多外观设计是以外包装等形式出现的平面设计,可能与知名商品特有包装、装潢重合或交叉。如果一个外观设计有一定的独创性,有显著的识别性,而且在长期的使用中形成自己独特的装潢,那么就有可能同时成为专利法、著作权法、商标法和反不正当竞争法保护的客体。而当这些客体属于不同的主体时,不免容易发生冲突,并在目前难以解决,因为每个主体在行使其权利时,都有其法律依据,这在一定程度上鼓励和纵容了侵权行为,,损害了知识产权权利人的利益,更重要的是不利于我国的外观设计水平的发展,因此外观设计权利冲突问题须引起高度重视。 本文第一章首先是介绍了外观设计权利冲突的研究背景及意义,对国内外研究现状进行综述,提出现有研究的不足,并简要说明本文的研究内容和研究方法。第二章是对外观设计权利冲突基本理论问题的解析,明确权利冲突的存在并值得研究,限定外观设计的范围,从而对外观设计权利冲突作出界定,构成本文的理论基础和分析依据。第三章是通过外观设计权利与著作权、商标权以及知名商品特有包装装潢使用权相冲突这三类典型冲突的案例分析冲突的表现形式,进而分析其产生冲突的原因。第四章对我国现有解决外观设计权利冲突的模式进行研究,并提出存在的问题。最后一章分析国外解决外观设计权利冲突的经验对我国的启示,提出完善我国外观设计保护的思路及建议,以协调外观设计专利与在先权利冲突为基础,转变外观设计立法模式,完善外观设计专利授权审查制度,并建设合理的配套措施。
[Abstract]:Conflict of rights is a common legal phenomenon. In the field of intellectual property rights, it is more likely to produce conflict of rights because of the particularity of its object. The conflict of rights in the field of intellectual property has attracted extensive attention and active discussion. The patent law of our country has the esthetic request to the object of appearance design that it protects, this makes it have certain originality and pour into the thought of the creator, so some of them may overlap or cross with the object of copyright protection; The design takes shape, design and color, or a combination thereof as design elements, and the part that is recognizable may overlap or intersect with the object trademark protected by trademark law; many designs are graphic designs in the form of outer packaging, etc. If a design has a certain originality, significant recognition, and forms its own unique decoration in long-term use, then it may become a patent law at the same time. Copyright Law, Trademark Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law protect objects. When these objects belong to different subjects, they are prone to conflict and are difficult to resolve at present, because each subject has its own legal basis in exercising its rights. This encourages and connives the infringement to a certain extent, damages the interests of the intellectual property right holders, and more importantly, is not conducive to the development of the design level in our country. Therefore, the conflict of the design rights should be paid great attention to. The first chapter of this paper introduces the background and significance of the research on the conflict of design rights, summarizes the current research situation at home and abroad, and points out the shortcomings of the existing research. The second chapter is the analysis of the basic theory of the conflict of the right to design, the existence of the conflict of rights and worthy of study, and limit the scope of the design. Thus, the conflict of design rights is defined, which constitutes the theoretical basis and analytical basis of this paper. Chapter three is based on the design rights and copyright. Trademark rights and the conflicts of the right to use the special packaging and decoration of well-known commodities the case study on the conflict forms of the three kinds of typical conflicts, Then it analyzes the causes of the conflict. Chapter 4th studies the existing mode of resolving the conflict of design rights in China, and puts forward the existing problems. The last chapter analyzes the enlightenment of the experience of foreign countries in resolving the conflict of the right to design in China. This paper puts forward some ideas and suggestions for perfecting the protection of design in our country, on the basis of coordinating the conflict between the patent of design and the conflict of prior rights, changing the legislative mode of design, perfecting the examination system of patent authorization of design, and constructing reasonable supporting measures.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 DavidMusker,刘新宇,龙文;欧盟外观设计专利制度介绍[J];电子知识产权;2004年04期

2 周根才;高毅龙;;外观设计专利侵权判定若干问题[J];法律适用;2007年05期

3 胡充寒;;外观设计专利侵权判定混淆标准的反思与重构[J];法律适用;2010年06期

4 李阁霞;;知识产权权利冲突探析[J];法学杂志;2008年01期

5 吴汉东;关于知识产权本体、主体与客体的重新认识——以财产所有权为比较研究对象[J];法学评论;2000年05期

6 郝铁川;权利冲突:一个不成为问题的问题[J];法学;2004年09期

7 张淑华;;试析外观设计专利权与著作权的冲突及其解决[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2009年03期

8 苏平;;部分外观设计专利问题探析与思考[J];中国发明与专利;2012年10期

9 胡余旺;;权利冲突的法哲学思考[J];河北法学;2010年08期

10 刘秀臣;外观设计知识产权保护的立法模式[J];广西社会科学;2001年02期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 本报记者 魏小毛;[N];中国知识产权报;2006年



本文编号:1574870

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1574870.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4758e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com